Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <78c0b444-8a95-396e-5f5e-8175f94a49cc@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:32:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes
Content-Language: en-US
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230602013358.900637-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
In-Reply-To: <20230602013358.900637-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 02.06.23 03:33, John Hubbard wrote:
> It turned out that an even dozen patches were required in order to get the
> selftests building cleanly, and all running, once again. I made it worse on
> myself by insisting on using clang, which seems to uncover a few more warnings
> than gcc these days.
> 
> So I still haven't gotten to my original goal of running a new HMM test that
> Alistair handed me (it's not here yet), but at least this fixes everything I ran
> into just now.

Thanks, now I can stop commenting out some (IIRC primarily uffd-related) 
tests when just wanting to run some specific tests on some of odd 
installations :D

I assume this round you only consideres 64bit builds, right? My last 
attempts with 32bit revealed a lot of issues, and I only fixed what I 
really wanted to test (COW).

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb