Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To:     bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
        martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
        haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for non-NULLable PTR_TO_BTF_IDs
Date:   Fri,  2 Jun 2023 10:01:12 -0500
Message-Id: <20230602150112.1494194-2-void@manifault.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230602150112.1494194-1-void@manifault.com>
References: <20230602150112.1494194-1-void@manifault.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

In a recent patch, we taught the verifier that trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID can
never be NULL. This prevents the verifier from incorrectly failing to
load certain programs where it gets confused and thinks a reference
isn't dropped because it incorrectly assumes that a branch exists in
which a NULL PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is never released.

This patch adds a testcase that verifies this cannot happen.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c        |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index cdf4acc18e4c..d89191440fb1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -70,5 +70,6 @@ void test_cpumask(void)
 		verify_success(cpumask_success_testcases[i]);
 	}
 
+	RUN_TESTS(cpumask_success);
 	RUN_TESTS(cpumask_failure);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 2fcdd7f68ac7..602a88b03dbc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
 #include "cpumask_common.h"
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -426,3 +427,26 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_global_mask_rcu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__success
+int BPF_PROG(test_refcount_null_tracking, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
+
+	mask1 = bpf_cpumask_create();
+	mask2 = bpf_cpumask_create();
+
+	if (!mask1 || !mask2)
+		goto free_masks_return;
+
+	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask1);
+	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)mask2);
+
+free_masks_return:
+	if (mask1)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(mask1);
+	if (mask2)
+		bpf_cpumask_release(mask2);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.40.1