Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp3810462rwd; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5zdmZw3a380b68TFDRI2uWDVsXlTmLPbklH2iMFYyrVpq6qBCJdVorX2nAv9SorEJjB76h X-Received: by 2002:a92:d7c7:0:b0:33d:6d9f:b65c with SMTP id g7-20020a92d7c7000000b0033d6d9fb65cmr4301338ilq.6.1685820313724; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1685820313; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OThKYoPa1rV/z7hZebDWiSUMyCEaQ7vmLUl+BOG7vketzPElmo0Y9sJxWTYAqXaHZx XAp+A/dX+X2Acb57EK5pY4b+v3Y17ZTzdhaHX9QE8igMozTgligSexqEmBJZNtddTk28 +29kgyRendDOJVaDIoAxris3/qdRKunJLG1OMj8xcObDhy4bUbfF1Qe6ZzJayt+Simap nf7BcZFVtKuHvLbGBkpRt+TDvEfYCqwIzrV5Trfg6ReGRO+FV9yDNnrO2iXTNUgXNEP9 av4GW1KdTAgATRFQM59FXu0t3jFW5FAwRVSCACgpdiuGSU+Zr5ajpQff33N2nXGmTkbx UkzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=gzeGaEdVQKIV/5Wg1JRCZ2+bzGhoZFIQv0hV96B2f3E=; b=yqeYWw9pM92RfnFM/30BQVmSCZgMjJWl+L9g65GULMDw61WveKi22zlKipxI+M5sUo Tc/iaJI3+DgCdtFotPb+abaMMkklPC7w/eHEGswXD6ZLq7SUCuHWX5zgi9ky7Fd7qYbY WSJmQy19nTDBJTrirNo40qVoEDrdWf9ceQpbA85CiekTvnPAFY14HWUzbdhS1cON/iQe vWMpMleqdH0ov1/hhIqe7VI/CWCxDqyqjuronjCFPN/1W9DQiPM9AFEQGatNDbtrACz0 jcQ2EG/S6xiO9DIx5zOz9UwLIs3qLkSdipIHTCy4SJklCSU2k1jsyqp5UteEuTg8SjB7 3YnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s28-20020a63925c000000b005428de93a2asi3116116pgn.142.2023.06.03.12.25.01; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 12:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229987AbjFCTQ5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 3 Jun 2023 15:16:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229922AbjFCTQl (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jun 2023 15:16:41 -0400 Received: from frasgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [14.137.139.23]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E082E49; Sat, 3 Jun 2023 12:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.229]) by frasgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QYTqS0DRFz9xHvd; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 03:06:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.204.63.22]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id LxC2BwCnCuZXkXtkAEoJAw--.3607S5; Sat, 03 Jun 2023 20:16:13 +0100 (CET) From: Roberto Sassu To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, eparis@parisplace.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org, Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v11 3/4] evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 21:15:17 +0200 Message-Id: <20230603191518.1397490-4-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230603191518.1397490-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230603191518.1397490-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: LxC2BwCnCuZXkXtkAEoJAw--.3607S5 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxXF43tw1kKw15Kr1kGF4xtFb_yoWrCr13pF Zxt3WUCr1rAFyUWryFyF47u3WSgFWrGr4Dt393GryjyF1Dtr1xtFWFyr15uryrXrW8GrnY qw429r1ruwn0y3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB2b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUWw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV WxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Gr1j6F4UJwAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ew Av7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY 6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4IIrI8v6xkF7I0E8cxan2IY04v7MxAIw28IcxkI7V AKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCj r7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVW8ZVWrXwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6x IIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1lIxAIcVCF 04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUFYFCUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: purev21wro2thvvxqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/1tbiAQARBF1jj44QwwABs5 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3,RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Roberto Sassu Change the evm_inode_init_security() definition to align with the LSM infrastructure. Keep the existing behavior of including in the HMAC calculation only the first xattr provided by LSMs. Changing the evm_inode_init_security() definition requires passing the xattr array allocated by security_inode_init_security(), and the number of xattrs filled by previously invoked LSMs. Use the newly introduced lsm_get_xattr_slot() to position EVM correctly in the xattrs array, like a regular LSM, and to increment the number of filled slots. For now, the LSM infrastructure allocates enough xattrs slots to store the EVM xattr, without using the reservation mechanism. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- include/linux/evm.h | 13 +++++++------ security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 16 ++++++++++------ security/security.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h index 7dc1ee74169..597632c71c7 100644 --- a/include/linux/evm.h +++ b/include/linux/evm.h @@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_set_acl(struct dentry *dentry, { return evm_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, acl_name, NULL, 0); } -extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, - const struct xattr *xattr_array, - struct xattr *evm); +extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, + const struct qstr *qstr, + struct xattr *xattrs, int *xattr_count); extern bool evm_revalidate_status(const char *xattr_name); extern int evm_protected_xattr_if_enabled(const char *req_xattr_name); extern int evm_read_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry, u8 *buffer, @@ -157,9 +157,10 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_set_acl(struct dentry *dentry, return; } -static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, - const struct xattr *xattr_array, - struct xattr *evm) +static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, + const struct qstr *qstr, + struct xattr *xattrs, + int *xattr_count) { return 0; } diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index cf24c525558..475196ce712 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -864,23 +865,26 @@ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid) /* * evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm HMAC value */ -int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, - const struct xattr *lsm_xattr, - struct xattr *evm_xattr) +int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, + const struct qstr *qstr, struct xattr *xattrs, + int *xattr_count) { struct evm_xattr *xattr_data; + struct xattr *evm_xattr; int rc; - if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || - !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) + if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || !xattrs || + !evm_protected_xattr(xattrs->name)) return 0; + evm_xattr = lsm_get_xattr_slot(xattrs, xattr_count); + xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS); if (!xattr_data) return -ENOMEM; xattr_data->data.type = EVM_XATTR_HMAC; - rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, lsm_xattr, xattr_data->digest); + rc = evm_init_hmac(inode, xattrs, xattr_data->digest); if (rc < 0) goto out; diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index bee45009581..3962bd14012 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -1645,8 +1645,8 @@ int security_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, if (!xattr_count) goto out; - ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, new_xattrs, - &new_xattrs[xattr_count]); + ret = evm_inode_init_security(inode, dir, qstr, new_xattrs, + &xattr_count); if (ret) goto out; ret = initxattrs(inode, new_xattrs, fs_data); -- 2.25.1