Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp4394662rwd; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 04:38:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5r9ofkMR/0FduTABrokqDnDSXeKwgW70TFzDxUuGveSuNzhN2ycOJKFqJrEG8cjmVhOfoy X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2244:b0:753:ca30:6bb0 with SMTP id o4-20020a056602224400b00753ca306bb0mr10010931ioo.4.1685878684263; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 04:38:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1685878684; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O7cfC3cC4qxRT4o1gKtwQeyBrUpeDlYefOElUghznoxvZUNtjSmQdvWrZgKEApcWA5 UJhOCMTOvB7D471SF/ouHwfkBPK/qQfVy/VUl36Z+Z6mkByMZ7WTN52qwT4v7mWfwEjS jDeFgxCF9I0tppEqyA/Lu6X2szhbxZbljAVUHr73h+hpTNDi+k4EnuyfjR48kjP4Ool+ LgPvkoO5/KSEpskIGrOXcZsswX3t/gvsSJgIya75I811bupa7WAsvlEzBK10qC/HKkhq 6pJSVcFvywkU+eFB2m5EInPgglzGQoFRz2xBJkfusEv08p1VhbNjUPc19Ww4XKKZAWST pJ/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=3SKNAu7zJO5KHCveM4xQy1CxguwBajqReGagb81eOzY=; b=YOb+d9QuIJpm9aNb5V8n3LwwaylSrotBvxKaGAopRPZ5S53pNHqT7pinHVaz3yBwvl myzBw91UNpjkNJahLTOv8Z2UvqDr++W7dmF7LJFtZ4ApljloIhs3tmCQNPrsjFTJ7lFl B1CgOy1bmqcgbxOwZzcBONWg4atDlXkrjMnkoMSzAkvBBVNCU5caAtqdP9yjTonT+IC9 jIVaB7eiYKu1a5xq2PEkm5SaeGns2aIaenZ2xKv4WD3QQ7GjJoPd12+HUo9g4PrvNIW2 rCq6eHhu/CoxcJxSqHIjQmmob7ACc608v9is0zm/Osl/LYVCu540k70xSSGtteDO858n 5JHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 83-20020a630056000000b005250385bfdbsi4142842pga.549.2023.06.04.04.37.50; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 04:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230503AbjFDKuQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 06:50:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229578AbjFDKuN (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 06:50:13 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561E7B4; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 03:50:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 354Ao34u001739; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 12:50:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 12:50:03 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Shuah Khan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Vincent Dagonneau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: ensure fast64 integer types have 64 bits Message-ID: References: <20230530-nolibc-fast64-v1-1-883dea6bc666@weissschuh.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230530-nolibc-fast64-v1-1-883dea6bc666@weissschuh.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:18:00AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote: > On 32bit platforms size_t is not enough to represent [u]int_fast64_t. > > Fixes: 3e9fd4e9a1d5 ("tools/nolibc: add integer types and integer limit macros") > Signed-off-by: Thomas Wei?schuh > --- > Cc: Vincent Dagonneau > > Note: We could also fall back to compiler-provided data like: > > __UINT_FAST{8,16,32,64}_{TYPE,MIN,MAX}__ I'm fine with the way you did it. I'm wondering how we managed to miss this one given the tests in place! Now queued, thank you Thomas. Willy