Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2023 16:08:08 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@routerhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@cs.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@constell8.be>,
        erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, mithat.guner@xeront.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 25/30] net: dsa: mt7530: properly set
 MT7531_CPU_PMAP
Message-ID: <20230604130808.3lxuz5ezsouhku57@skbuf>
References: <20230522121532.86610-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230522121532.86610-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230522121532.86610-26-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230522121532.86610-26-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230526155124.sps74wayui6bydao@skbuf>
 <9423a818-f9c0-d867-7f7d-27f05e1536b9@arinc9.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <9423a818-f9c0-d867-7f7d-27f05e1536b9@arinc9.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 11:21:48AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> > Stylistically, the existence of an indirect call to priv->info->cpu_port_config()
> > per switch family is a bit dissonant with an explicit check for device id later
> > in the same function.
> 
> mt753x_cpu_port_enable() is not being called from priv->info->cpu_port_config()
> though.

Quite the other way around. I'm saying that mt753x_cpu_port_enable(),
the function whose logic you're changing, already has a mechanism to
execute code specific to one switch family.

> I'm not sure how I would do this without the device ID check here.

Hmm, by defining a new mt7530_cpu_port_config() procedure for ID_MT7621
and ID_MT7530?

Although in a different thread we are perhaps challenging the idea that
what is currently in priv->info->cpu_port_config() is useful - at least
half of it are manual invocations of phylink methods which are possibly
not needed. If after the removal of those, it no longer makes sense to
have priv->info->cpu_port_config() at all, then I'm not saying that the
explicit check for device id here doesn't make sense. Just that it's not
in harmony with what currently exists 3 lines above.

> > > -#define  MT7531_CPU_PMAP_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
> > > +#define  MT7531_CPU_PMAP(x)		((x) & 0xff)
> > 
> > You can leave this as ((x) & GENMASK(7, 0))
> 
> Now that I've read Russell's comment on the previous patch, the below would
> be even better?
> 
> MT7531_CPU_PMAP(x)		FIELD_PREP(MT7531_CPU_PMAP_MASK, x)
> 
> > 
> > > +#define  MT7531_CPU_PMAP_MASK		MT7531_CPU_PMAP(~0)
> > 
> > There's no other user of MT7531_CPU_PMAP_MASK, you can remove this.
> 
> Should I do above or remove this?

No specific preference. If you want to make this driver start using
FIELD_PREP() then go ahead.