Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <49fa3dc5-ffdb-2af4-9b7a-3d19e88bcbda@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 4 Jun 2023 20:56:32 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.2
Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, James Seo <james@equiv.tech>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech>
 <975d35cb-e0aa-8ea7-5520-238d1aa4cbaf@infradead.org>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <975d35cb-e0aa-8ea7-5520-238d1aa4cbaf@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/3/23 22:55, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> It sounds to me like we should just prohibit (not allow) emails that
> don't have a To: recipient in them. It also sounds like mutt (and maybe
> other software) have problems.
> 

In mutt, there is a command for reply-to-all (named group-chat-reply),
but you need to assign key binding for it. I'd like to type Esc-g
for this purpose. The corresponding .muttrc is:

```
bind index,pager "<esc>g" group-chat-reply
```

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara