Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 08:50:01 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The robot is broken (was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] USB: serial: return
 errors from break handling)
Message-ID: <ZH2FmTrOkQI8FA__@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <202306031014.qzAY3uQ6-lkp@intel.com>
 <ZHyGd5BRjUaOdYyF@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <ZH1lAtO0nG801FrZ@rli9-mobl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZH1lAtO0nG801FrZ@rli9-mobl>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:30:58PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:

> > The robot currently appears to be broken though as this report was never
> > sent to me or the relevant mailing lists (and I just happened to see it
> > by chance).
> 
> Thanks a lot Johan for checking this. For now, the bot has 2 similar mailing lists,
> one is oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, which contains the high confidence report that
> is sent directly to author and related CC. Another one is this oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev,
> that we will send low confidence issues here and they will only be really reported
> out after manual check. So we can reduce false positives.

Ah, thanks for the explanation and sorry about the noise.

Johan