Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:23:14 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
Cc:     Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio/vsock: fix sock refcnt bug on owner set
 failure
Message-ID: <nn4zy6aop35ljmf4vg6nelxwo45abvv7rvit62abjvd3eypwpz@kgiusizdyigd>
References: <20230531-b4-vsock-fix-refcnt-v1-1-0ed7b697cca5@bytedance.com>
 <35xlmp65lxd4eoal2oy3lwyjxd3v22aeo2nbuyknc4372eljct@vkilkppadayd>
 <ZHbAgkvSHEiQlFs6@bullseye>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZHbAgkvSHEiQlFs6@bullseye>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:35:30AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 09:58:47AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 07:47:32PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > Previous to setting the owner the socket is found via
>> > vsock_find_connected_socket(), which returns sk after a call to
>> > sock_hold().
>> >
>> > If setting the owner fails, then sock_put() needs to be called.
>> >
>> > Fixes: f9d2b1e146e0 ("virtio/vsock: fix leaks due to missing skb owner")
>> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
>> > ---
>> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> > index b769fc258931..f01cd6adc5cb 100644
>> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> > @@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
>> >
>> > 	if (!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk)) {
>> > 		WARN_ONCE(1, "receiving vsock socket has sk_refcnt == 0\n");
>> > +		sock_put(sk);
>>
>> Did you have any warning, issue here?
>>
>> IIUC skb_set_owner_sk_safe() can return false only if the ref counter
>> is 0, so calling a sock_put() on it should have no effect except to
>> produce a warning.
>>
>
>Oh yeah, you're totally right. I did not recall how
>skb_set_owner_sk_safe() worked internally and thought I'd introduced an
>uneven hold/put count with that prior patch when reading through the
>code again. I haven't seen any live issue, just misread the code.
>
>Sorry about that, feel free to ignore this patch.

No problem ;-)

Maybe we should add a comment on it.

Thanks,
Stefano