Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:00:25 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc:     virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= <eperezma@redhat.com>,
        Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: filter VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature
Message-ID: <20230605085840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20230605110644.151211-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
 <20230605084104-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <24fjdwp44hovz3d3qkzftmvjie45er3g3boac7aezpvzbwvuol@lmo47ydvnqau>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <24fjdwp44hovz3d3qkzftmvjie45er3g3boac7aezpvzbwvuol@lmo47ydvnqau>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:41:54AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > vhost-vdpa IOCTLs (eg. VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE)
> > > don't support packed virtqueue well yet, so let's filter the
> > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature for now in vhost_vdpa_get_features().
> > > 
> > > This way, even if the device supports it, we don't risk it being
> > > negotiated, then the VMM is unable to set the vring state properly.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Notes:
> > >     This patch should be applied before the "[PATCH v2 0/3] vhost_vdpa:
> > >     better PACKED support" series [1] and backported in stable branches.
> > > 
> > >     We can revert it when we are sure that everything is working with
> > >     packed virtqueues.
> > > 
> > >     Thanks,
> > >     Stefano
> > > 
> > >     [1] https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20230424225031.18947-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com/
> > 
> > I'm a bit lost here. So why am I merging "better PACKED support" then?
> 
> To really support packed virtqueue with vhost-vdpa, at that point we would
> also have to revert this patch.
> 
> I wasn't sure if you wanted to queue the series for this merge window.
> In that case do you think it is better to send this patch only for stable
> branches?
> > Does this patch make them a NOP?
> 
> Yep, after applying the "better PACKED support" series and being sure that
> the IOCTLs of vhost-vdpa support packed virtqueue, we should revert this
> patch.
> 
> Let me know if you prefer a different approach.
> 
> I'm concerned that QEMU uses vhost-vdpa IOCTLs thinking that the kernel
> interprets them the right way, when it does not.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano
> 

If this fixes a bug can you add Fixes tags to each of them? Then it's ok
to merge in this window. Probably easier than the elaborate
mask/unmask dance.

> > 
> > >  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > index 8c1aefc865f0..ac2152135b23 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > > @@ -397,6 +397,12 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_get_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
> > > 
> > >  	features = ops->get_device_features(vdpa);
> > > 
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * IOCTLs (eg. VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE) don't support
> > > +	 * packed virtqueue well yet, so let's filter the feature for now.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	features &= ~BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED);
> > > +
> > >  	if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
> > >  		return -EFAULT;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > base-commit: 9561de3a55bed6bdd44a12820ba81ec416e705a7
> > > --
> > > 2.40.1
> >