Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 15:41:10 +0000
From:   Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc:     Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
        Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: arm64: initialize HCRX_EL2
Message-ID: <ZH4CFmwo+BBPMWiY@linux.dev>
References: <20230509142235.3284028-1-kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
 <20230509142235.3284028-2-kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
 <ZHnzfhi2KCMPucQJ@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZHnzfhi2KCMPucQJ@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 02:49:50PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Kristina Martsenko wrote:
> > ARMv8.7/9.2 adds a new hypervisor configuration register HCRX_EL2.
> > Initialize the register to a safe value (all fields 0), to be robust
> > against firmware that has not initialized it. This is also needed to
> > ensure that the register is reinitialized after a kexec by a future
> > kernel.
> > 
> > In addition, move SMPME setup over to the new flags, as it would
> > otherwise get overridden. It is safe to set the bit even if SME is not
> > (uniformly) supported, as it will write to a RES0 bit (having no
> > effect), and SME will be disabled by the cpufeature framework.
> > (Similar to how e.g. the API bit is handled in HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS.)
> 
> This looks fine to me but I may have lost track of the VHE/nVHE code
> initialisation paths.
> 
> Marc/Oliver, are you ok with this patch (or this series in general)? I'd
> like to merge it through the arm64 tree.

Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver