Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, seanjc@google.com,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
        jiangshanlai@gmail.com, shan.kang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/33] x86: enable FRED for x86-64
In-Reply-To: <a87319a8-f87b-7bbb-697f-eb98b6ad4875@zytor.com>
References: <20230410081438.1750-1-xin3.li@intel.com>
 <a87319a8-f87b-7bbb-697f-eb98b6ad4875@zytor.com>
Date:   Mon, 05 Jun 2023 19:32:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87zg5d4xy5.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 05 2023 at 10:22, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> So I feel obliged to throw in some defending of Xin here, mostly because=
=20
> in some of these cases I'm the perkeleen vittup=C3=A4=C3=A4[1] and not Xi=
n.

That's clear from the authorship and the style of the patches and not
all was criticism was directed at Xin obviously. He's just the messenger
in that case.

Thanks,

        tglx