Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:07:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:07:39 -0500 Received: from ife.ee.ethz.ch ([129.132.29.2]:23656 "EHLO ife.ee.ethz.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:07:27 -0500 Message-ID: <3A191B03.6DE258C8@ife.ee.ethz.ch> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:37:23 +0100 From: Thomas Sailer Organization: IfE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: de,fr,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: test11-pre6 still very broken In-Reply-To: <20001117223137.A26341@wirex.com> <3A162EFE.A980A941@talontech.com> <20001117235624.B26341@wirex.com> <8v6h3d$rp$1@penguin.transmeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'd disagree. UHCI has tons of advantages, not the least of which is > [Cthat it was there first and is widely available. If OHCI hadn't been > done we'd have _one_ nice good USB controller implementation instead of UHCI has a couple of disadvantages, though (and some of them could have been fixed with only very little added gates). For example: - one cannot reliably unlink transfer buffers from the queues without waiting 1ms - bandwidth reclamation can be a real PCI hog > I hope EHCI makes it all moot. Some way or another. Only for USB2 devices. EHCI is supposed to be paired with an existing UHCI or OHCI controller core that is supposed to take over the USB connector if an USB 1.x hub or device is plugged in. So we end up needing to support UHCI and OHCI for a very long time, I don't see mice and keyboards going USB2 anytime soon 8-) Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/