Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 5 Jun 2023 15:45:52 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
CC:     MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, <rogerq@kernel.org>,
        <vigneshr@ti.org>, <srk@ti.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: pru: add support for configuring GPMUX based
 on client setup
Message-ID: <20230605204552.x4ctuzos4rysldwj@sessions>
References: <20230601105904.3204260-1-danishanwar@ti.com>
 <ZH4aywQoA9gy2OWU@p14s>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZH4aywQoA9gy2OWU@p14s>
Precedence: bulk

On 11:26-20230605, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
[...]
> Here I have to suppose pruss_cfg_get_gpmux() has been added to Nishanth's tree.
> As such the only way for me to apply your patch is if Nishanth sends me a pull
> request for the patchset that introduced pruss_cfg_get_gpmux().  You can also
> resend this in the next cycle.

Yes, I had pulled this in [1] along with a few other driver fixes. I
can send you an immutable tag to pull for your tree, if that helps the
process along though, it might have a unrelated driver fixup patch as
part of the series though..

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/168434617580.1538524.11482827517408254591.b4-ty@ti.com/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git/log/?h=ti-drivers-soc-next
-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D