Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:42:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:42:11 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:32681 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:41:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:30:21 -0500 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: CML2 1,9.10 is available Message-ID: <20011217163021.A16097@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , CML2 , kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/ Release 1.9.10: Mon Dec 17 16:23:01 EST 2001 * Rulebase and help sync with 2.4.17-rc1/2.5.1. * Configure.help now covers every live symbol in these kernels. * SuperH port update by Niibe Yutaka. * Ooops...edit hex values in hex! * Rob Landley's UI changes in menuconfig. * Backed out Richard Todd's fix for dependent binding. We found a case that broke it; Todd acknowledged the problem. * Compiler can now handle "suppress depend" on an "impure" guard, that is one that contains disjunctions and other logical operations. * User is now warned when setting an invisible symbol that might not be saved out. Richard Todd has found some theoretical problems with forcing of ancestor symbols by a dependent. These show up only when a change in multiple dependents of a symbol is made and one of the changes is later nacked out. We're not aware of any cases in which these break the behavior of the kernel ruleset, but this qualifies as a genuine bug which I will fix. -- Eric S. Raymond The abortion rights and gun control debates are twin aspects of a deeper question --- does an individual ever have the right to make decisions that are literally life-or-death? And if not the individual, who does? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/