Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763607AbXJNUza (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:55:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754487AbXJNUzX (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:55:23 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:12244 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754141AbXJNUzW (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:55:22 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Dv5/VDVV5c6A2ncEoEOfkyDlGrjhNeS7YZ7za+zxGFCxA2LvrkUxT+I4qG1YaIXZOlUffrWTj/8micCjwzIEIT3tpNSVcecVpGRj+zQsuPtniN3ePeT/NSHhLOi5c9qxk1mZ8d0jh/7zW8gh0f3PDu43RGP3Oa6i6CvpC0Bc+ng= From: poison To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-2.6.23 - acting funny Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:55:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710111409.13854.bgrpt@toplitzer.net> <200710120053.20202.rc.poison@gmail.com> <20071012060516.GA26074@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071012060516.GA26074@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200710142255.11806.rc.poison@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1707 Lines: 57 Hi and thanks for your reply :) On Friday 12 October 2007, you wrote: > i have no quick ideas - the behavior you are seeing is quite unexpected. > Could you try the current sched-devel code: > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/devel/sched-devel-combo-v2.6.23.patc >h Maybe I messed something up. I first applied that patch and tested. Then reversed the patch with patch -R ... but in both cases the output of the cfs-debug-info script contained: Sched Debug Version: v0.05-v20 > > since this version of CFS does various things differently then the one > in v2.6.23, lets see whether perturbing it makes any difference to your > throughput. Without Hog: ~15MB/s With Hog: ~19/MBs > > you could also try the scheduler backport to v2.6.22.10, at: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/ with sched-cfs-v2.6.22.9-v22.patch applied to 2.6.22.10 (I didn't spot one for 2.6.22.10): Without Hog: ~14MB/s With Hog: ~19MB/s > > that would establish whether it's the changes in scheduling that cause > this or something else. Plus please enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG and > CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS and run this debug script while such a transfer is > going on: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh > > and send me the resulting file. I created one for each tested kernel with $ while true; do echo test>/dev/null; done running and without. I'll send you the files in private. Thanks for your time. Regards, Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/