Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 12:09:11 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= <eperezma@redhat.com>,
        Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: filter VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature
Message-ID: <kpcujul6foyvw66qhy3wck5bzgedka2gzzixupnaog7byr4h45@6ddbvcy32db4>
References: <20230605110644.151211-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
 <20230605084104-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <24fjdwp44hovz3d3qkzftmvjie45er3g3boac7aezpvzbwvuol@lmo47ydvnqau>
 <20230605085840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <gi2hngx3ndsgz5d2rpqjywdmou5vxhd7xgi5z2lbachr7yoos4@kpifz37oz2et>
 <20230605095404-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <32ejjuvhvcicv7wjuetkv34qtlpa657n4zlow4eq3fsi2twozk@iqnd2t5tw2an>
 <20230605173958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230605173958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:44:50PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:56:37PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:54:57AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:30:35PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:00:25AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:41:54AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> > > > > > > vhost-vdpa IOCTLs (eg. VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE)
>> > > > > > > don't support packed virtqueue well yet, so let's filter the
>> > > > > > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature for now in vhost_vdpa_get_features().
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > This way, even if the device supports it, we don't risk it being
>> > > > > > > negotiated, then the VMM is unable to set the vring state properly.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
>> > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>> > > > > > > ---
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Notes:
>> > > > > > >     This patch should be applied before the "[PATCH v2 0/3] vhost_vdpa:
>> > > > > > >     better PACKED support" series [1] and backported in stable branches.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     We can revert it when we are sure that everything is working with
>> > > > > > >     packed virtqueues.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     Thanks,
>> > > > > > >     Stefano
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >     [1] https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20230424225031.18947-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm a bit lost here. So why am I merging "better PACKED support" then?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To really support packed virtqueue with vhost-vdpa, at that point we would
>> > > > > also have to revert this patch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I wasn't sure if you wanted to queue the series for this merge window.
>> > > > > In that case do you think it is better to send this patch only for stable
>> > > > > branches?
>> > > > > > Does this patch make them a NOP?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yep, after applying the "better PACKED support" series and being
>> > > > > sure that
>> > > > > the IOCTLs of vhost-vdpa support packed virtqueue, we should revert this
>> > > > > patch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Let me know if you prefer a different approach.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm concerned that QEMU uses vhost-vdpa IOCTLs thinking that the kernel
>> > > > > interprets them the right way, when it does not.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Stefano
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > If this fixes a bug can you add Fixes tags to each of them? Then it's ok
>> > > > to merge in this window. Probably easier than the elaborate
>> > > > mask/unmask dance.
>> > >
>> > > CCing Shannon (the original author of the "better PACKED support"
>> > > series).
>> > >
>> > > IIUC Shannon is going to send a v3 of that series to fix the
>> > > documentation, so Shannon can you also add the Fixes tags?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Stefano
>> >
>> > Well this is in my tree already. Just reply with
>> > Fixes: <>
>> > to each and I will add these tags.
>>
>> I tried, but it is not easy since we added the support for packed virtqueue
>> in vdpa and vhost incrementally.
>>
>> Initially I was thinking of adding the same tag used here:
>>
>> Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
>>
>> Then I discovered that vq_state wasn't there, so I was thinking of
>>
>> Fixes: 530a5678bc00 ("vdpa: support packed virtqueue for set/get_vq_state()")
>>
>> So we would have to backport quite a few patches into the stable branches.
>> I don't know if it's worth it...
>>
>> I still think it is better to disable packed in the stable branches,
>> otherwise I have to make a list of all the patches we need.
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>
>OK so. You want me to apply this one now, and fixes in the next
>kernel?

Yep, it seems to me the least risky approach.

Thanks,
Stefano