Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763534AbXJNWf7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:35:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764260AbXJNWfn (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:35:43 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:42551 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764245AbXJNWfl (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:35:41 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: /4eUmGyrRv3W5F1/rIvZPSFyd4avP3o1rMuJK7H/ofXI 1192401339 Message-ID: <471299C0.3020908@imap.cc> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:35:44 +0200 From: Tilman Schmidt Organization: me - organized?? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070509 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Richter CC: David Newall , Matthew Wilcox , Rob Landley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Suparna Bhattacharya , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: What still uses the block layer? References: <200710112011.22000.rob@landley.net> <20071013220539.GD29934@parisc-linux.org> <4711AF18.3030201@davidnewall.com> <471255E4.3070009@s5r6.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <471255E4.3070009@s5r6.in-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE65DE5328EDE3413BE186FE6" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2469 Lines: 67 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE65DE5328EDE3413BE186FE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 14.10.2007 19:46 schrieb Stefan Richter: > David Newall wrote: >> That is so rude. >=20 > Such responses sometimes happen after provocative posts like the thread= > starter's. Provocation is often in the eye of the beholder, and basic manners should be observed nevertheless. > He could have asked straight away for help with fixing his > boot environment instead of wrapping his question into a feigned design= > discussion. No, he couldn't have. He quite obviously didn't even know enough to understand his boot environment might be at fault, and hence was unable to conceive the question you're demanding from him. > It appeared as if he is out for a fight rather than > interested in help. It may have appeared like that from the highly antagonistic mindset that seems so prevalent in LKML. But if one just stepped back and took a breath before answering it should have been quite obvious that he wasn't. (out for a fight, that is) Granted, it can be difficult to comprehend the point of view of someone who does not know or understand something you yourself know or understand well. But you should at least be aware of that inability, and consequently refrain from accusing of provocation where there may be none. Hanlon's razor, cynical as it may sound at first, is an eminently humanistic principle. --=20 Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite) --------------enigE65DE5328EDE3413BE186FE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHEpnAMdB4Whm86/kRAg1wAJ9QKDnNPQjx1PlomYVsMbH6zSvr4gCffAVr /kqGZ0DLBKr0iUnyRcGW1s0= =AfvW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE65DE5328EDE3413BE186FE6-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/