Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:41:33 -0500
From:   Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To:     "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-beagleboneai64: Fixup
 reference to phandles array
Message-ID: <20230606114133.qgokk37e5lcyrqui@prewashed>
References: <20230601152636.858553-1-nm@ti.com>
 <20230601152636.858553-4-nm@ti.com>
 <f1e54167-15bd-8a0b-454d-53b90b18a343@ti.com>
 <20230605204930.3hlg3d36zwtbkal7@scone>
 <cbd314b6-08a9-7a07-7538-c2e3f1b333e9@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <cbd314b6-08a9-7a07-7538-c2e3f1b333e9@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 09:56-20230606, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> On 6/6/2023 2:19 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 22:31-20230605, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
> > > > index 37c24b077b6a..c13246a9ed8f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts
> > [...]
> > > > @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ &main_i2c6 {
> > > >    &wkup_i2c0 {
> > > >    	status = "okay";
> > > >    	pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > -	pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default &eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
> > > > +	pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_i2c0_pins_default>, <&eeprom_wp_pins_default>;
> > > >    	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > > Why we need more than 2 pio lines for i2c node ,
> > pio lines? I am not sure I understand. If you are suggesting
> > eeprom_wp_pins to be moved to the eeprom node, It is probably
> > un-related to this series, but OK, i think it is probably a valid
> > change (unless Robert sees a reason why he did it the way he did).
> 
> correct, I am suggesting to move? eeprom_wp_pins_default to eeprom node.
> 
> i2c needs 2 lines which are defined in wkup_i2c0_pins_default, Adding
> eeprom_wp_pins_default will not be true representation of i2c node.
> 
> It will be good to have similar changes in main_i2c1 and main_i2c5? node for
> csi0_gpio_pins_default and csi1_gpio_pins_default.

Robert: your opinion here?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D