Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:16:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:15:50 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:12078 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:15:39 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test11-pre7: isapnp hang To: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:45:36 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <8v9uc1$5c5$1@cesium.transmeta.com> from "H. Peter Anvin" at Nov 19, 2000 05:22:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It seems to me that it would be better to initialize all the (non-PnP) > ISA cards first, and have them claim their preferred ranges. Now you > can pick the PnP isolate port out of what is left, and also have a > much better idea of what is available. Post 2.4 only. It means re-architecting all the ISA probes so that they don't mix the PnP and non PnP probes. I suspect implementing a copy of the PCI hot swap API would be the simplest - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/