Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: ie3994620:Fastmail
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 15:19:24 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
        khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com,
        aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv13 5/9] efi: Add unaccepted memory support
Message-ID: <20230606121924.wcjezcppuiofvnk6@box.shutemov.name>
References: <20230601182543.19036-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20230601182543.19036-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
 <20230605154333.GLZH4CpV3eXCCWCGxi@fat_crate.local>
 <20230605173303.k5yt535snxyk4ez3@box.shutemov.name>
 <20230605191225.GCZH4zmbtkWWRG4lzf@fat_crate.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230605191225.GCZH4zmbtkWWRG4lzf@fat_crate.local>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So how about you explain that explicitly somewhere, perhaps in a comment
> above accept_memory(), that the unaccepted range is not the whole memory
> but only, well, what is unaccepted and the rest is implicitly accepted?

Does it look okay to you?

/*
 * accept_memory() -- Consult bitmap and accept the memory if needed.
 *
 * Only memory that explicitly marked as unaccepted in the bitmap requires
 * an action.
 *
 * No need to accept:
 *  - anything if the system has no unaccepted table;
 *  - memory that is below phys_base;
 *  - memory that is above the memory that addressable by the bitmap;
 */

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov