Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:46:25 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Suraj Upadhyay <usuraj35@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO
Message-ID: <20230606144625.GF5197@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
References: <cover.1686047727.git.code@siddh.me>
 <52c8eb0f241a9d67ce5b7e6fc64dc397e735ccd8.1686047727.git.code@siddh.me>
 <20230606142322.GB5197@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <1889125187d.5d36766d120183.6659725053490512400@siddh.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1889125187d.5d36766d120183.6659725053490512400@siddh.me>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:08:27PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 19:53:22 +0530, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Siddh,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> 
> Anytime :)
> 
> > Any plan to remove it from drivers as well ? If not you should mention
> > in the commit message (probably in the subject line itself) that you're
> > only addressing the DRM core.
> > 
> > Same comment for further patches in this series.
> 
> Yeah, this patch set aims to replace just in drm core (as mentioned in
> the cover).
> 
> I thought "drm" would suffice since I did not specify a specific driver
> like i915. So the subject line should say "drm core: ..."?

I would write

drm: Remove usage of deprecated DRM_INFO in DRM core

The "drm: " prefix doesn't imply you're touching the core only, you
could do a tree-wide change that also touches all drivers.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart