Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2023 09:16:14 +0200
From:   Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@gmail.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com, martin.hecht@avnet.eu,
        michael.roeder@avnet.eu, linuxfancy@googlegroups.com,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
        Gerald Loacker <gerald.loacker@wolfvision.net>,
        Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@gmail.com>,
        Shawn Tu <shawnx.tu@intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@foss.st.com>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Ha=C5=82asa?= <khalasa@piap.pl>,
        Nicholas Roth <nicholas@rothemail.net>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] media: dt-bindings: alvium: add document YAML
 binding
Message-ID: <ZIAuvjmyUpuY/eDk@tom-HP-ZBook-Fury-15-G7-Mobile-Workstation>
References: <20230606155416.260941-1-tomm.merciai@gmail.com>
 <20230606155416.260941-3-tomm.merciai@gmail.com>
 <20230606163656.GI25679@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <20230606-jaundice-womankind-7e583789fb7a@spud>
 <20230606181752.GC14101@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
 <20230606-create-catchable-e16113afac82@spud>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230606-create-catchable-e16113afac82@spud>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Conor,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:23:32PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:17:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:07:42PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > Hey Laurent, Tommaso,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:36:56PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > +  alliedvision,lp2hs-delay-us:
> > > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > > > +    description:
> > > > > +      Low power to high speed delay time in microseconds.
> > > > 
> > > > You can drop "in microseconds", that's implied by the suffix.
> > > > 
> > > > > +      The purpose of this property is force a DPhy reset for the period
> > > > > +      described by the microseconds on the property, before it starts
> > > > > +      streaming. To be clear, with that value bigger than 0 the Alvium
> > > > > +      forces a dphy-reset on all lanes for that period. That means all
> > > > > +      lanes go up into low power state. This may help a csi2 rx ip to
> > > > > +      reset if that IP can't deal with a continous clock.
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to propose what I think is a clearer version:
> > > > 
> > > >     description: |
> > > >       Low power to high speed delay time.
> > > > 
> > > >       If the value is larger than 0, the camera forces a reset of all
> > > >       D-PHY lanes for the duration specified by this property. All lanes
> > > >       will transition to the low-power state and back to the high-speed
> > > >       state after the delay. Otherwise the lanes will transition to and
> > > >       remain in the high-speed state immediately after power on.
> > > > 
> > > >       This is meant to help CSI-2 receivers synchronizing their D-PHY
> > > >       RX.
> > > 
> > > Question about the property.
> > > Why not make it have a minimum value of 1 and drop the special-case
> > > behaviour for zero?
> > 
> > The property is optional, so it can indeed be omitted if no delay is
> > desired. I have no strong preference on whether or not to allow 0 as a
> > valid value.
> 
> FWIW, I prefer the semantics of the property if it doesn't have the
> limbo state of being present but doing nothing.
> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.
> 
> BTW, I seem to get bounces from shawnx.tu@intel.com, who is listed in
> MAINTAINERS for several drivers. Do you know if they have a non-intel
> address to replace those entries with, or should they be dropped?

Same here! :)

Thanks,
Tommaso