Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:54:09 +0200
From:   Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alexis.lothore@bootlin.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
        Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] net: dwmac_socfpga: initialize local
 data for mdio regmap configuration
Message-ID: <20230607165409.7fddd49a@pc-7.home>
In-Reply-To: <ZIB306nKrhiru0hJ@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20230607135941.407054-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
        <20230607135941.407054-6-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
        <ZIB306nKrhiru0hJ@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Organization: Bootlin
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:28:03 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:59:41PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > @@ -447,19 +446,22 @@ static int socfpga_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		struct mdio_regmap_config mrc;
> >  		struct regmap *pcs_regmap;
> >  		struct mii_bus *pcs_bus;
> >    
> ...
> > +		memset(&mrc, 0, sizeof(mrc));  
> ...
> >  		mrc.parent = &pdev->dev;
> >  		mrc.valid_addr = 0x0;
> > +		mrc.autoscan = false;  
> 
> Isn't this covered by the memset() ?

I have the same answer as for the above. It's redundant, but I don't
think there's any harm having it set explicitely ?

Maxime