Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:34:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:34:23 -0500 Received: from mailhost.teleline.es ([195.235.113.141]:38753 "EHLO tsmtp6.mail.isp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:34:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:33:59 +0100 From: Diego Calleja To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jurgen Botz Subject: Re: Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1! Message-ID: <20011218003359.A555@diego> In-Reply-To: <20011217025856.A1649@diego> <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org>; from jurgen@botz.org on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:20:31 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.pre5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Well, I've run badblocks in 2.4.16 results: root@diego:~# badblocks -n -vv /dev/hdc5 Initializing random test data Checking for bad blocks in non-destructive read-write mode >From block 0 to 9671067 Checking for bad blocks (non-destructive read-write test): done Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. root@diego:~# It takes about 6 hours to check this...but perhaps I should repeat again in 2.4.17-rc1. It works in 2.4.16, but ls /hdc5/etc Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device 16:05) ... Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.25 Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68722 0x0 SD] Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68669 0x0 SD] Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 64508 0x0 SD] Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 63049 0x0 SD] Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68673 0x0 SD] Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match to the expected one 1 Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found in block 10667. Fsck? Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68377 0x0 SD] This is my opinion: -Something (reiserfs, anything) has caused fs corruption -It should be repaired by reiserfsck, but it's broken :-(( -This corruption should NOT have happened, reiserfsck shouldn't have to be used. -I'm not a kernel hacker, so I can't try anything...what I know is that /etc in hc5 doesn't work. /usr, /var....works correctly. Well, I'd like to know what's happened in my drive. Can somebody try to give an explanation? Diego Calleja - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/