Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 7 Jun 2023 21:07:09 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
Cc:     sfrench@samba.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 0/2] Backport few dfs related fixes to cifs
Message-ID: <2023060750-unpledged-effective-bd95@gregkh>
References: <20230607185313.11363-1-risbhat@amazon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230607185313.11363-1-risbhat@amazon.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:53:11PM +0000, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
> Recently we have been seeing kernel panic in cifs_reconnect function
> while accessing tgt_list. Looks like tgt_list is not initialized
> correctly. There are fixes already present in 5.10 and later trees.
> Backporting them to 5.4
> 
>  CIFS VFS: \\172.30.1.14 cifs_reconnect: no target servers for DFS
>  failover
>  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffff8
>  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>  PGD 260e067 P4D 260e067 PUD 2610067 PMD 0
>  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>  RIP: 0010:cifs_reconnect+0x51d/0xef0 [cifs]
>  RSP: 0018:ffffc90000693da0 EFLAGS: 00010282
>  RAX: fffffffffffffff8 RBX: ffff8887fa63b800 RCX: fffffffffffffff8
>  Call Trace:
>  cifs_handle_standard+0x18d/0x1b0 [cifs]
>  cifs_demultiplex_thread+0xa5c/0xc90 [cifs]
>  kthread+0x113/0x130
> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***

No blurb?

And this says 5.4, yet your patches say 5.10?

Totally confused...

greg k-h