Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 07 Jun 2023 18:32:59 -0400
Message-ID: <b09b591926e0f297fe0a3e9d8fcf3a6a.paul@paul-moore.com>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     jmorris@namei.org, keescook@chromium.org,
        john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
        stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, mic@digikod.net, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/11] SELinux: Add selfattr hooks
References: <20230428203417.159874-11-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230428203417.159874-11-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Apr 28, 2023 Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> 
> Add hooks for setselfattr and getselfattr. These hooks are not very
> different from their setprocattr and getprocattr equivalents, and
> much of the code is shared.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
>  security/selinux/hooks.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 2ee92d3fb79d..e78b955e04f8 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -6542,6 +6559,81 @@ static int selinux_setprocattr(const char *name, void *value, size_t size)
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +static int selinux_getselfattr(unsigned int attr, struct lsm_ctx __user *ctx,
> +			       size_t *size, u32 flags)
> +{
> +	char *value;
> +	size_t total_len;
> +	int len;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	len = selinux_lsm_getattr(attr, current, &value);
> +	if (len < 0)
> +		return len;
> +
> +	total_len = ALIGN(struct_size(ctx, ctx, len), 8);
> +
> +	if (total_len > *size)
> +		rc = -E2BIG;

Hmm.  Since we need to calculate the aligned @total_len value in the
LSM specific code, perhaps it doesn't make sense to also do the
alignment in lsm_fill_user_ctx().  My apologies, I know I was the one
who suggested doing the alignment in a common place previously.

> +	else if (ctx)
> +		rc = lsm_fill_user_ctx(ctx, value, len, LSM_ID_SELINUX, 0);
> +	else
> +		rc = 1;
> +
> +	*size = total_len;
> +	if (rc < 0)
> +		return rc;
> +	return 1;
> +}

--
paul-moore.com