Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp369538rwd; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 01:43:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ756sNlSrI+/R7gVecjLBwZOTf5o3pEF0CT0z5QEIi2+HlARpf2h51JqBIHkmt8JHCiYTke X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:160c:b0:fa:1f3a:8f56 with SMTP id l12-20020a056a20160c00b000fa1f3a8f56mr2247428pzj.12.1686213794409; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 01:43:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686213794; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RFf0BMEMHM4aPmlkdwgc/wZxAZuK5crtOnk8RjK7N0Y0pcKc4EWLwfURVHvWOVjGCo 9nJn1xV+gerJxqc3YEG0JbYlTlkaeipzz4RHra/WWEQV0Zb6ZnO6jXtitLTlbyIZSpPM Yuw+EZ8Z0bx6SndVtotK/45FdNhqf+ZfsmTWtvAEyEyHLdsCerhJjOUUR5yUZzIpbUJA E1T6lHjWm3aEBd+NMX8rbcs3nF52HuQiYAXHb1CAtsXu2dnCfBPdfuxxNesAmqgRTjNI JWcnNTwGL2N48x6idBnyOVazCGe57ZAn5c9+H4bwEXjE3BpIvKss6ucqoXstybMxv/+w KwFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:feedback-id :dkim-signature; bh=KLXdTmjiH6XbwQ8H1+gxtl5yVppFjz4D4oQopIcKuzQ=; b=JFmlJmNUItVsMH82znqaQd7tOgZpPhtcxFsWijO8QwnuvhnQ165L1dg6UOcnamqrVy VycmOMNntgi7pL++5ZX1zp7APvzg6C+P2sMEAQ5R1llQeor4bafenNmvcQgnKlY9Pe3I ZXBZ2OkETo+IFbDnZ913qyPA033uScKO3jLhAEOvfOZEMrm/njfO3QUlB4jO9lHdqSfO hJf8LnuOcEz3/JZN97Fx8D1loECVSiXPvVcj7hb4sXz2l4A2DhZ5gf23S+9F55eEaGAA zBi2vrkedcATwmhcdKWczlmQmw9gVVr3kfDP9ILB+O7La1W+88DTd783f45VH3Ojy+dt OAiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=d9ZfRMzh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bs71-20020a63284a000000b00541e09de13bsi429042pgb.10.2023.06.08.01.42.58; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 01:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=d9ZfRMzh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235501AbjFHHkK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 03:40:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38732 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235514AbjFHHjy (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 03:39:54 -0400 Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D96134; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 00:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5779580263; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 03:39:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Jun 2023 03:39:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1686209989; x=1686217189; bh=KLXdTmjiH6Xbw Q8H1+gxtl5yVppFjz4D4oQopIcKuzQ=; b=d9ZfRMzhwi/NYPwdIRTmXsfAeCzO/ 25b7Gw2Veda1kYwShYOWCeRLGfu4tuj/6aQA4ymGTwoUXlLzwqbIwSk6fu/XP8Pq LImvHWuv+65pDZclZ5u6b0WRJKcXEvTbUTZIDPEB3O88T/zswOe7xSm1ZD5Ht/Wx +KGv05xSeKgXzdq/9SMiFJsqXWsWKgTi5LVzJvkGVP2bDo/plaPg8rjbkRJbSUI1 0mI5A26L5m9Tfv7HbaNb2iDzF1a5DWjv15aetlwE+cbNQF+nX7KO4bbtvcUgIaPK pgDtSZX/IXpuYT9kkCamdWlgwfXzovnwy0PrpT6OXAqpNdlEgyWPNdmdA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgedthedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefkugho ucfutghhihhmmhgvlhcuoehiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedvudefveekheeugeeftddvveefgfduieefudeifefgleekheegleegjeej geeghfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hiughoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i494840e7:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 03:39:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 10:39:45 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel To: David Ahern Cc: Breno Leitao , Remi Denis-Courmont , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexander Aring , Stefan Schmidt , Miquel Raynal , Willem de Bruijn , Matthieu Baerts , Mat Martineau , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Xin Long , axboe@kernel.dk, asml.silence@gmail.com, leit@fb.com, Martin KaFai Lau , Alexei Starovoitov , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Jason Xing , Joanne Koong , Hangyu Hua , Guillaume Nault , Andrea Righi , Wojciech Drewek , open list , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" , "open list:DCCP PROTOCOL" , "open list:IEEE 802.15.4 SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:NETWORKING [MPTCP]" , "open list:SCTP PROTOCOL" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks Message-ID: References: <20230606180045.827659-1-leitao@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:45:49AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > What kind of testing was done with the patch? Would be good to run > through a NOS style of test suites to make sure the ipmr and ip6mr > changes are correct. (cc'ed Ido since the mlxsw crew has a really good > test up) We don't have that many multicast routing tests, but I ran those that we do have and they passed.