Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:09:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:09:20 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:63986 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:09:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:38:38 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel To: Ville Herva cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] blindingly stupid 2.2 VM bug In-Reply-To: <20001119100100.A54301@niksula.cs.hut.fi> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Ville Herva wrote: > My questions is: I saw Andrea's VM-global patch being > recommended as a solution for this problem, and I already > compiled it in (although I haven't booted into it yet). Should I > use Rik's or Andrea's patch? This patch is incremental with VM-global, but that's only because the Conectiva kernel RPM happens to contain VM-global, not because I agree with all points of VM-global (some of the changes seem a bit .. suspect). Luckily my patch fixes some of the suspect areas in VM-global and most of the other parts of VM-global make a lot of sense. It's not perfect, but it should be good enough for 2.2. On whether any of these improvements are going into the next 2.2, don't bother asking me since I have no intention paying much attention to 2.2 and I was only needing it to install a machine with ext3... regards, Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11. http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/