Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757085AbXJOVYU (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:24:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753571AbXJOVYK (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:24:10 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43543 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545AbXJOVYJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:24:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:24:06 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Add BSS to resource tree Message-ID: <20071015212406.GA17804@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, ak@suse.de References: <20071015115042.391348549@strauss.suse.de> <20071015115042.958614570@strauss.suse.de> <20071015113206.36c06361.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071015113206.36c06361.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 47 * Andrew Morton [2007-10-15 20:32]: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:43 +0200 > Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c > > @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ struct resource code_resource = { > > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM > > }; > > > > +struct resource bss_resource = { > > + .name = "Kernel bss", > > + .start = 0, > > + .end = 0, > > + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM > > +}; > > + > > static struct resource system_rom_resource = { > > .name = "System ROM", > > .start = 0xf0000, > > @@ -287,6 +294,7 @@ legacy_init_iomem_resources(struct resou > > */ > > request_resource(res, code_resource); > > request_resource(res, data_resource); > > + request_resource(res, &bss_resource); > > Looks ungainly, doesn't it? Perhaps we should add a third arg to > legacy_init_iomem_resources(), or change legacy_init_iomem_resources() to > take zero args? Yes. But when we change legacy_init_iomem_resources(), then we should also change efi_initialize_iomem_resources(). But that's declared in and so a change in ia64 code is required which I wanted to avoid. But that patch is for review of the idea. If nobody has objections, then I'll implement the IA64 change anyway -- and then the 3rd parameter can be added. Thanks, Bernhard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/