Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759208AbXJOVg4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755363AbXJOVgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:45 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:45989 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752639AbXJOVgo (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:35:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Daniel Walker cc: Steven Rostedt , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?S=E9bastien_Dugu=E9?= , Ingo Molnar , Linux RT Users , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq In-Reply-To: <1192478816.17527.58.camel@imap.mvista.com> Message-ID: References: <20071011142417.1d965820@bull.net> <1192470246.17527.15.camel@imap.mvista.com> <1192478816.17527.58.camel@imap.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 42 On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > This is the second fix for this .. The first was in this email (over a > > > month ago) > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/31/318 > > > > You're right I missed that. (I even read it). But for fixes like this, (or > > any patches that are not in the tree), you really need to resend the > > series. > > In hindsight I should have resent, but I didn't .. Really it's a matter > of frustration on my part. Where I submit patches that should be > included , but they are ignored for no clear reason .. Then I submit > again, and the patches are ignored again for no clear reason.. You were asked to rebase your patches against the latest -rt kernel. And you bluntly refused to. I knew exactly why I ignored the patches when I was moving -rt forward. Simply because I had not enough time to review them in detail. Ingo acked them in principle, but we had subtle wreckage from such changes before and I had no intention to put more risk into a non trivial merge. Sorry, you have provided sloppy patches more than once and requested us to pick random bugfixes from a broken ftp server or from the mailing list. It's you who wrote the track record, not us. I'm finally fed up with your prima ballerina attitudes. Either you want to be part of this project or not. If yes, then please accept that you are not setting the rules how this works. If no, please stop whining at us and look for a nice sandpit where you can play these silly games. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/