Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758543AbXJOVpx (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:45:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751722AbXJOVpo (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:45:44 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:9637 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752667AbXJOVpn (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:45:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] RT: fix spin_trylock_irq From: Daniel Walker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Steven Rostedt , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Dugu=E9?= , Ingo Molnar , Linux RT Users , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: References: <20071011142417.1d965820@bull.net> <1192470246.17527.15.camel@imap.mvista.com> <1192478816.17527.58.camel@imap.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:44:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1192484650.17527.76.camel@imap.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2049 Lines: 48 On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 14:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > This is the second fix for this .. The first was in this email (over a > > > > month ago) > > > > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/31/318 > > > > > > You're right I missed that. (I even read it). But for fixes like this, (or > > > any patches that are not in the tree), you really need to resend the > > > series. > > > > In hindsight I should have resent, but I didn't .. Really it's a matter > > of frustration on my part. Where I submit patches that should be > > included , but they are ignored for no clear reason .. Then I submit > > again, and the patches are ignored again for no clear reason.. > > You were asked to rebase your patches against the latest -rt > kernel. And you bluntly refused to. Nope , I did rebase my patches when Steven asked me to .. > I knew exactly why I ignored the patches when I was moving -rt > forward. Simply because I had not enough time to review them in > detail. Ingo acked them in principle, but we had subtle wreckage from > such changes before and I had no intention to put more risk into a non > trivial merge. > > Sorry, you have provided sloppy patches more than once and requested > us to pick random bugfixes from a broken ftp server or from the > mailing list. It's you who wrote the track record, not us. Oh boy here we go again .. Let just stop right here.. > I'm finally fed up with your prima ballerina attitudes. Either you > want to be part of this project or not. If yes, then please accept > that you are not setting the rules how this works. If no, please stop > whining at us and look for a nice sandpit where you can play these > silly games. > > tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/