Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 9 Jun 2023 10:19:55 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mips: asm-offsets: add missing prototypes
Message-ID: <20230609081955.GB8160@alpha.franken.de>
References: <20230516194000.548487-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <20230516194000.548487-2-arnd@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230516194000.548487-2-arnd@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:39:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Building with -Werror and W=1 fails entirely because of warnings in
> asm-offsets.c:
> 
> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:26:6: error: no previous prototype for 'output_ptreg_defines' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:78:6: error: no previous prototype for 'output_task_defines' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:92:6: error: no previous prototype for 'output_thread_info_defines' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:108:6: error: no previous prototype for 'output_thread_defines' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:136:6: error: no previous prototype for 'output_thread_fpu_defines' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 
> Nothing actually calls these functions, so just add prototypes to shut
> up the warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]