Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:   Fri, 09 Jun 2023 17:19:15 +0300
Message-Id: <CT86OCSDQS17.21FWH48JRKKI9@suppilovahvero>
Cc:     "Krishna Yarlagadda" <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>,
        "jsnitsel@redhat.com" <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "peterhuewe@gmx.de" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        "Sowjanya Komatineni" <skomatineni@nvidia.com>,
        "Laxman Dewangan" <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
        "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
References: <CS48A9Y752N4.QEM73WVMZYLQ@suppilovahvero>
 <3df39f0b-70dc-4b42-bae1-72c07607cbc7@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZEaWQD_QTs2usVl8@orome>
 <5fae29cd-d5f4-4616-be1c-1cd4d5b9a538@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZEag1lAonYcmNFXk@orome>
 <DM4PR12MB5769BB69B97F77DBA9ED2935C3779@DM4PR12MB5769.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <DM4PR12MB5769499349B6B936FE46BF0CC3419@DM4PR12MB5769.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <ZHhW_wFvRWInR_iM@orome> <dec901be-4bef-43e0-a125-23c5c4e92789@sirena.org.uk> <ZHiQ44gAL3YEZPUh@orome> <c0cf893d-8bc5-4f4b-a326-bb10dd0c84de@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <c0cf893d-8bc5-4f4b-a326-bb10dd0c84de@sirena.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu Jun 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM EEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:36:51PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:04:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:29:51AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > > > any ideas on how we can best get this merged? I guess at this point=
 it
> > > > could go through either tree since the SPI dependency has been in L=
inus'
> > > > tree since v6.4-rc1.
>
> > > I would expect it to go via whatever path TPM patches usually take gi=
ven
> > > that it's a TPM patch.
>
> > There might have been a misunderstanding. My recollection was that you
> > had said a few weeks ago that you would pick this up. Going through the
> > thread again I realize that may not have been what you meant. Perhaps
> > Jarkko misinterpreted this in the same way.
>
> > Jarkko, can you pick this up for v6.5?
>
> No, I said that I had applied the SPI parts for v6.4 so there would be
> no blocker whenever people got round to reviewing the TPM side.

I'm totally cool with this: won't pick the patch then.

BR, Jarkko