Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <983d701befce7fc0010c53d09be84f5c330bdf45.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Sat, 10 Jun 2023 06:32:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <71105dbf-cdb0-72e1-f9eb-eeda8e321696@omp.ru>
References: <71105dbf-cdb0-72e1-f9eb-eeda8e321696@omp.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 23:22 +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> IRQ0 is no longer returned by platform_get_irq() and its ilk -- they now
> return -EINVAL instead.  However, the kernel code supporting SH3/4 based
> SoCs still maps the IRQ #s starting at 0 -- modify that code to start the
> IRQ #s from 16 instead.
> 
> The patch should mostly affect the AP-SH4A-3A/AP-SH4AD-0A boards as they
> indeed are using IRQ0 for the SMSC911x compatible Ethernet chip...

Do you mind if I remove the ellipsis at the end of this sentence when I merge
this later today? I think it makes no sense from a grammatical point of view.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913