Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:32:38 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To:     Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Cc:     kuba@kernel.org, vadfed@meta.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
        pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net,
        edumazet@google.com, vadfed@fb.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
        richardcochran@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, javierm@redhat.com,
        ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, mst@redhat.com, tzimmermann@suse.de,
        michal.michalik@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com, airlied@redhat.com,
        ogabbay@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, nipun.gupta@amd.com,
        axboe@kernel.dk, linux@zary.sk, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        milena.olech@intel.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
        hkallweit1@gmail.com, andy.ren@getcruise.com, razor@blackwall.org,
        idosch@nvidia.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
        phil@nwl.cc, claudiajkang@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
        mschmidt@redhat.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 05/10] dpll: api header: Add DPLL framework base
 functions
Message-ID: <ZIQnFqRBhmv3+SF8@nanopsycho>
References: <20230609121853.3607724-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
 <20230609121853.3607724-6-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230609121853.3607724-6-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:18:48PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>

[...]

>+struct dpll_device_ops {
>+	int (*mode_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
>+			enum dpll_mode *mode, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	int (*mode_set)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
>+			const enum dpll_mode mode,
>+			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	bool (*mode_supported)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, void *dpll_priv,
>+			       const enum dpll_mode mode,
>+			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>+	int (*source_pin_idx_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>+				  void *dpll_priv,
>+				  u32 *pin_idx,
>+				  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);

I'm pretty sure I wrote this to the last patchset version as well.
You call this op from anywhere, it's a leftover, please remove it.
In ptp_ocp remove it as well and implement the state_on_dpll pin op
instead. I'm pretty sure no one tested ptp_ocp with this patchset
version otherwise this would show-up :/

[...]