Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:23:19 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        corbet@lwn.net, snitzer@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, dlemoal@kernel.org,
        wsa@kernel.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
        ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] blksnap - block devices snapshots module
Message-ID: <2023061204-jigsaw-punch-0e6a@gregkh>
References: <20230609115206.4649-1-sergei.shtepa@veeam.com>
 <ZIaVz62ntyrhHdup@infradead.org>
 <1bfc8c1d-f49a-2128-a457-4651832f3d2a@veeam.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1bfc8c1d-f49a-2128-a457-4651832f3d2a@veeam.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/12/23 05:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Sergei,
> > 
> > what tree does this apply to?  New block infrastructure and drivers
> > should be against Jen's for-6.5/block tree, and trying to apply the
> > series against that seems to fail in patch 1 already.
> > 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Thank you. My mistake is that for the base branch I used this:
> Link: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
> 
> > Jen's for-6.5/block tree
> Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.5/block
> I have to prepare a patch for this branch.
> 
> I'm sorry if I remind you of a kitten who is just learning how to
> properly lap milk from a bowl :)
> 
> I guess I don't need to increment the patch version.
> Is it enough to do a "RESEND"?

It's a new version as you had to rebase it.

thanks,

greg k-h