Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:23:39 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8996: Use read-only RCG ops for
 RPM bus clocks
Message-ID: <ZIcOS2o0l72R3lbt@gerhold.net>
References: <20230612-topic-rcg2_ro-v1-0-e7d824aeb628@linaro.org>
 <20230612-topic-rcg2_ro-v1-2-e7d824aeb628@linaro.org>
 <ZIbw0dEdFNFcC0Hr@gerhold.net>
 <8196144d-6cf1-897c-2520-3686e6414abb@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8196144d-6cf1-897c-2520-3686e6414abb@linaro.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 01:46:26PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 12.06.2023 12:17, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:22:48AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> The config/periph/system NoC clocks are wholly controlled by the
> >> RPM firmware and Linux should never ever alter their configuration.
> >>
> >> Switch them over to read-only ops to avoid that.
> >>
> >> Fixes: b1e010c0730a ("clk: qcom: Add MSM8996 Global Clock Control (GCC) driver")
> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >> index 5e44d1bcca9e..588e3b67657a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c
> >> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 system_noc_clk_src = {
> >>  		.name = "system_noc_clk_src",
> >>  		.parent_data = gcc_xo_gpll0_gpll0_early_div,
> >>  		.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_xo_gpll0_gpll0_early_div),
> >> -		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> >> +		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ro_ops,
> >>  	},
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 config_noc_clk_src = {
> >>  		.name = "config_noc_clk_src",
> >>  		.parent_data = gcc_xo_gpll0,
> >>  		.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_xo_gpll0),
> >> -		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> >> +		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ro_ops,
> >>  	},
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 periph_noc_clk_src = {
> >>  		.name = "periph_noc_clk_src",
> >>  		.parent_data = gcc_xo_gpll0,
> >>  		.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_xo_gpll0),
> >> -		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> >> +		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ro_ops,
> >>  	},
> >>  };
> >>  
> > 
> > If the rcg is read-only then it shouldn't need a .freq_tbl (the
> > .recalc_rate() works without it). These clocks have one for some reason.
> .get_parent needs it
> 

Hm? .get_parent uses the ->parent_map but not the ->freq_tbl as far as I
can see. :)

Stephan