Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 12:16:08 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 00/11] PCI: dwc: Relatively simple fixes and
 cleanups
Message-ID: <20230612171608.GA1339616@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230612164124.ytqn5lfeaxds6ywq@mobilestation>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:41:24PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:41:27AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:19:54PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > It turns out the recent DW PCIe-related patchset was merged in with
> > > several relatively trivial issues left unsettled (noted by Bjorn and
> > > Manivannan). All of these lefovers have been fixed in this patchset.
> > > Namely the series starts with two bug-fixes. The first one concerns the
> > > improper link-mode initialization in case if the CDM-check is enabled. The
> > > second unfortunate mistake I made in the IP-core version type helper. In
> > > particular instead of testing the IP-core version type the macro function
> > > referred to the just IP-core version which obviously wasn't what I
> > > intended.
> > > ...
> 
> > I am unable to do anything with this series.
> > 
> > Google's legal team is reviewing this matter under applicable laws and
> > regulations.
> 
> I don't get it, how come Google gets to decide anything about what to
> do with this patchset?

I am employed by Google, and my Linux work is part of my job
responsibility, so Google sets some boundaries on my activities.

Bjorn