Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp93560rwd; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:30:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7+Bj5JFGkuj+uI5p2GqWT+UqIau4tzZjdZsYaQR85Q1Odq0vgDuMCN6csYguKeSx9B0NtD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:9987:b0:10c:37ed:3e88 with SMTP id ve7-20020a056a21998700b0010c37ed3e88mr11556360pzb.23.1686591041869; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686591041; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vqn7CeL4TPAhC88mJrFVYPZc/ynO2BMg47+7YkoDGZvLJ1azR0LvnRyrF4O3ymeMmO 09M6O/6vxPjKa/6Vxwvx6sGwUxOBjAwQ46+k87uidvPyee6weySLrDlzVEr3MWCeG9Xv c+Jv6foOFAxdvWxZSeSa/5FGcDXvYMnjdT8hgIjRR7nOAsocNtg9vvm5LqyBb8q25aXY ly7msEFLHNiOg/Qqek4FW9PTHhmMmw1jZiBqYRXx332HXCHiR8aktKwssRUMlKfBSVdP zxT9lOUT1SPBXxfaL9X28Qv5f7b3Sm3gXhfTVw/+MgOHcaBK3ikRBh9S7TYDH83FVVFv nNcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=SEk2oG1exWilLsW4LKsvx0U7x1YxXGFcOLTdiLfMLYs=; b=fsWcv33gn12tmqwu6Ou1FEyjPImMPYXbrY4GGGBNFVgIIBItwoBQ+W5UzNKWTIQVxY w5iOplsGPDZuXGJyZsbc2Mg7/qFPVyH1yvEijC35yYf+r4QpbbKoVxn6F869SGGtTxF5 XGn85Z/AHm/ZBSyIMH4Nlh0D+xaG+RZW6Prn8ruT/pKZXcimQVWPPruds+z2PglcKliv 04Mtnx2LOhr5f3su3LWq1rHc1M1epMQa77c9xgH+DU3t7B/S2JT5Q+owoGTmAtyBsbgb xYbd/B1A8GLOO3/3lnBAevdEHfkvNek1ovN/PZMkJiMYUOZCdyC/yu2jRIp93SRFGJ6F +H2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@iogearbox.net header.s=default2302 header.b=nVfveCr4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iogearbox.net Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u74-20020a63794d000000b0054405637a7esi7063848pgc.801.2023.06.12.10.30.29; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@iogearbox.net header.s=default2302 header.b=nVfveCr4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=iogearbox.net Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237037AbjFLREU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:04:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50882 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229716AbjFLRET (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:04:19 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de (www62.your-server.de [213.133.104.62]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E7FE0; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iogearbox.net; s=default2302; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=SEk2oG1exWilLsW4LKsvx0U7x1YxXGFcOLTdiLfMLYs=; b=nVfveCr4tjyjjGfnj5Oa1WEzMg ewhvrHkvj7t/91yelCB//j1zMkOgnODPX+wGcKaZAmfXBBGih1nByqLwH3Neqh4MMPu2SiRpMbL4B +0HnHkBHUS3m9LVag/zDKvxMupWvCEC0JiRtM5GtubX8DXLiSptZRADoOb2pDliYrHBY7oKerdkpI if0jcaAXhYfN30m2jAuUyWFiXn5pYa3Mh0vU0ZP6ehjBg9DiJcYMsE106BWf/lQ7zTLYvbqNfi4SF ff5zy1Nj8YzgmZl5p3CxLGrrclBUr9rDyvVSHcbz1pZcLIkjdz9GGxG0G4duIbhQiK+r/iZlgFuYm YYRcD53Q==; Received: from sslproxy02.your-server.de ([78.47.166.47]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1q8kxY-000Muz-6S; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:04:04 +0200 Received: from [85.1.206.226] (helo=linux.home) by sslproxy02.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q8kxX-0003Ok-Aa; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:04:03 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [v3] bpf: fix bpf_probe_read_kernel prototype mismatch To: Arnd Bergmann , Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Arnd Bergmann , stable@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend , Martin KaFai Lau , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Dave Marchevsky , Delyan Kratunov , Joanne Koong , Peter Zijlstra , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Roberto Sassu , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230602135128.1498362-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20230602135128.1498362-2-arnd@kernel.org> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:04:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230602135128.1498362-2-arnd@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.103.8/26937/Mon Jun 12 09:24:05 2023) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/23 3:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > bpf_probe_read_kernel() has a __weak definition in core.c and another > definition with an incompatible prototype in kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c, > when CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is enabled. > > Since the two are incompatible, there cannot be a shared declaration in > a header file, but the lack of a prototype causes a W=1 warning: > > kernel/bpf/core.c:1638:12: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] > > On 32-bit architectures, the local prototype > > u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) > > passes arguments in other registers as the one in bpf_trace.c > > BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size, > const void *, unsafe_ptr) > > which uses 64-bit arguments in pairs of registers. > > Change the core.c file to only reference the inner > bpf_probe_read_kernel_common() helper and provide a prototype for that, > to ensure this is compatible with both definitions. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Sorry for the delay. I just took in patch 1/2, thanks! Small comment below: > -- > v3: clarify changelog text further. > v2: rewrite completely to fix the mismatch. > --- > include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++ > kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 ++++++--- > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 3 +-- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h > index f58895830adae..55826398acfba 100644 > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h > @@ -2619,6 +2619,8 @@ static inline void bpf_dynptr_set_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr) > } > #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */ > > +int bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr); > + > void __bpf_free_used_btfs(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, > struct btf_mod_pair *used_btfs, u32 len); > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c > index 0926714641eb5..565ef6950c7a8 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -1635,11 +1636,13 @@ bool bpf_opcode_in_insntable(u8 code) > } > > #ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON > -u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) > +#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS > +int bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) > { > memset(dst, 0, size); > return -EFAULT; > } > +#endif > > /** > * ___bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context > @@ -1931,8 +1934,8 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn) > DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off); \ > CONT; \ > LDX_PROBE_MEM_##SIZEOP: \ > - bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \ > - (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \ > + bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \ > + (const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \ > DST = *((SIZE *)&DST); \ > CONT; > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > index 2bc41e6ac9fe0..290fdce2ce535 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c > @@ -223,8 +223,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto = { > .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING, > }; > > -static __always_inline int > -bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) > +int bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) > { > int ret; Given this is critical fast-path, please find a solution where we don't need to penalize bpf_probe_read_kernel_common. Thanks, Daniel