Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:34:39 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Alexander Stein <linux@ew.tq-group.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc, rft, PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: aggregator: Introduce delay
 support for individual output pins
Message-ID: <ZIdXL2Net/5ttmXB@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230608162130.55015-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <CACRpkdbaf3UzW+x6emER5J5KJUQoJmdipwY_RQp0Ovj2N6RnsA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbaf3UzW+x6emER5J5KJUQoJmdipwY_RQp0Ovj2N6RnsA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 09:50:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 6:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The aggregator mode can also handle properties of the platform, that
> > do not belong to the GPIO controller itself. One of such a property
> > is signal delay line. Intdoduce support of it.
> (...)
> > I don't like the idea of gpio-delay or similar. We have already GPIO
> > aggregator that incorporates the GPIO proxy / forwarder functionality.
> 
> You are right. This is the right solution going forward IMO.

Thank you for the support.

Take into consideration 1 kinda neutral and 2 for votes, I'll going to split
and improve the patch (series).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko