Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 22:27:20 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/23] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpm: Allow negative QoS
 offset
Message-ID: <ZId_qIAL8dvJOwai@gerhold.net>
References: <20230526-topic-smd_icc-v3-0-5fb7d39b874f@linaro.org>
 <20230526-topic-smd_icc-v3-7-5fb7d39b874f@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230526-topic-smd_icc-v3-7-5fb7d39b874f@linaro.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:24:24PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> In some very very very very unfortunate cases, the correct offset of
> the QoS registers will be.. negative. One such case is MSM8998, where
> The DDR BWMON occupies what-would-be-the-BIMC-base which we usually
> take into account with the register calculation, making the actual
> BIMC node start at what-would-be-the-BIMC-base+0x300.
> 
> In order to keep the calculation code sane, the simplest - however
> ugly it may be - solution is to allow the offset to be negative.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

I'm a bit confused why this patch is part of this series. It doesn't
seem to be directly related.

Can you send it as part of the series that adds the MSM8998 interconnect
driver?

Thanks,
Stephan

> ---
>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.h b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.h
> index d2c04c400cad..ba840a436cc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.h
> @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ enum qcom_icc_type {
>   * @num_intf_clks: the total number of intf_clks clk_bulk_data entries
>   * @type: the ICC provider type
>   * @regmap: regmap for QoS registers read/write access
> - * @qos_offset: offset to QoS registers
>   * @bus_clk_rate: bus clock rate in Hz
>   * @bus_clks: the clk_bulk_data table of bus clocks
>   * @intf_clks: a clk_bulk_data array of interface clocks
> + * @qos_offset: offset to QoS registers
>   * @keep_alive: whether to always keep a minimum vote on the bus clocks
>   * @is_on: whether the bus is powered on
>   */
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct qcom_icc_provider {
>  	int num_intf_clks;
>  	enum qcom_icc_type type;
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
> -	unsigned int qos_offset;
> +	int qos_offset;
>  	u64 bus_clk_rate[NUM_BUS_CLKS];
>  	struct clk_bulk_data bus_clks[NUM_BUS_CLKS];
>  	struct clk_bulk_data *intf_clks;
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct qcom_icc_desc {
>  	bool no_clk_scaling;
>  	enum qcom_icc_type type;
>  	const struct regmap_config *regmap_cfg;
> -	unsigned int qos_offset;
> +	int qos_offset;
>  };
>  
>  /* Valid for all bus types */
> 
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>