Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:39:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:39:15 -0500 Received: from 213-123-77-214.btconnect.com ([213.123.77.214]:26372 "EHLO penguin.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:39:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:10:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian To: "Charles Turner, Ph.D." cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote: > I certainly don't know what to purchase for my > next attempt at a "shrink-wrap" installation. Try Red Hat 7.0 -- it is certainly better. True, no distribution is perfect but over the years I've developed my own CD image upgrade.iso which goes directly after installing latest Red Hat distribution. It is full of things like BRS, dict(1), 'alias md="mkdir -p"' or "set editing-mode vi" which should be installed by default but for some reason aren't. upgrade.iso is about 120M which means there is only 120M of bits that separate "plain red hat" from "perfect Linux workstation" (assuming my configuration is perfect :) Red Hat 7.0 installed just fine on a range of my home machines from 486/66MHz/16M RAM to PIII laptop to 2way PIII desktop to 4way Xeon server -- some with SCSI, some without -- no glitches whatsoever. So, instead of blaming some old obsolete versions of Red Hat, try the latest, especially when recommending to a friend. The only obvious bug present even in the latest Red Hat 7.0 (which I keep forgetting to report to them) is that it won't boot if you install on a disk with lots of foreign partitions (I have UnixWare 7 and FreeBSD 4.x there) because the installation kernel doesn't support them and the final kernel does which creates a mismatch in the partition numbering. The above bug is not critical as Andries Brouwer has long ago fixed this bug in the 2.4 kernel (i.e. made DOS physical partitions enumerated first so no foreign partitions can mix anything up) so the workaround is -- boot your system somehow (be a man, find _some_ way of booting your system even if there is no way ;) and then install 2.4 kernel and from then on everything will be okay. Regards, Tigran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/