Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <3a8ff694-efdb-3ec0-c932-df681ef930cd@arinc9.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:51:18 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 0/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix multiple CPU ports, BPDU
 and LLDP handling
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@constell8.be>,
        mithat.guner@xeront.com, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
References: <20230612075945.16330-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <ZIcDee2+Lz7nJ3j6@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <ZIeFjdxctcR4yRLZ@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <66751af3-db5e-432a-859f-97e54c930e00@lunn.ch>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
In-Reply-To: <66751af3-db5e-432a-859f-97e54c930e00@lunn.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 13.06.2023 00:30, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:52:29PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:37:29PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please slow down your rate of patch submission - I haven't had a chance
>>> to review the other patches yet (and I suspect no one else has.) Always
>>> allow a bit of time for discussion.
>>>
>>> Just because you receive one comment doesn't mean you need to rush to
>>> get a new series out. Give it at least a few days because there may be
>>> further discussion of the points raised.
>>>
>>> Sending new versions quickly after previous comments significantly
>>> increases reviewer workload.
>>
>> And a very illustratory point is that I responded with a follow up to
>> your reply on v2, hadn't noticed that you'd sent v4, and the comments
>> I subsequently made on v2 apply to v4... and I haven't even looked at
>> v3 yet.
> 
> Hi Arınç
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html#netdev-faq
> 
> says:
> 
>    don't repost your patches within one 24h period
> 
>    2.6.6. Resending after review¶
> 
>    Allow at least 24 hours to pass between postings. This will ensure
>    reviewers from all geographical locations have a chance to chime
>    in. Do not wait too long (weeks) between postings either as it will
>    make it harder for reviewers to recall all the context.
>   
>    Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not
>    post a new version of the code if the discussion about the previous
>    version is still ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer.
> 
> During a weekend, i would say 24 hours is way too short, and 3 days is
> more like it, given that for a lot of people being a Maintainer is a
> day job, 9-5 week days.
> 
> You should also try to gauge how fast Maintainers are reacting. 24
> hours is often too fast. You know Russell is interested in these
> patches, so don't send a new version until you actually get feedback
> from him, and the discussion has come to a conclusion.

Understood, thank you both for the kind warning.

Arınç