Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 23:18:50 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Cc:     Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@constell8.be>,
        mithat.guner@xeront.com, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with
 multiple CPU ports on MT7530
Message-ID: <20230613201850.5g4u3wf2kllmlk27@skbuf>
References: <20230611081547.26747-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230611081547.26747-2-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <20230613150815.67uoz3cvvwgmhdp2@skbuf>
 <a91e88a8-c528-0392-1237-fc8417931170@arinc9.com>
 <20230613171858.ybhtlwxqwp7gyrfs@skbuf>
 <20230613172402.grdpgago6in4jogq@skbuf>
 <ca78b2f9-bf98-af26-0267-60d2638f7f00@arinc9.com>
 <20230613173908.iuofbuvkanwyr7as@skbuf>
 <edcbe326-c456-06ef-373b-313e780209de@arinc9.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <edcbe326-c456-06ef-373b-313e780209de@arinc9.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:58:33PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 13.06.2023 20:39, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Got it. Then this is really not a problem, and the commit message frames
> > it incorrectly.
> 
> Actually this patch fixes the issue it describes. At the state of this
> patch, when multiple CPU ports are defined, port 5 is the active CPU port,
> CPU_PORT bits are set to port 6.
> 
> Once "the patch that prefers port 6, I could easily find the exact name but
> your mail snipping makes it hard" is applied, this issue becomes redundant.

Ok. Well, you don't get bonus points for fixing a problem in 2 different
ways, once is enough :)