Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp1815738rwd; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:52:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ54c0eiZ95y4jU9Q9bOGMFix7X5c/HhCivT7BPAcBXBsTR3Cj5rcBrkuISN5Y46Ub/EF+Ci X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:da3:b0:973:e4c2:2bd0 with SMTP id go35-20020a1709070da300b00973e4c22bd0mr13796499ejc.8.1686693147446; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:52:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686693147; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XMHbxmuaBws/QNTlTf73VZOW6JpU6F/m2tbvrJS4Quz1dIk4Ga+gRvaIIlzrYBypmi NXCgMrDMtPSrtd7bOxOi77sk6Sr2XXzmzAUo1TRNT69egBEbl2nogMPKX9IMEAXVbt2z dSL4sLJrFU9/6jDsoKXgYRCj6/6+H6lN0Zz4ybtKiXV2FNkhDGs9IN4tt8K+tUBa4sT+ lrzmTN8u3I/7ZQ6D0V7wYTNaFCpiltFel7JZ1n/bf5WDGvIT/Uw8eHMofkh4fjTiFe8P Tu5OcOpYXeFNqt26DV9pjgkGwHI4tpTMSJQ+m28ihYtUW0Yq5ndvLExFv6KCa6ooqmAr 78+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=x/gNODkJisjqzYQs0veIDy1v6/fveTi4cj9c+jSVZJ8=; b=JxJv3wZlV+aJXEA0n0z9b1d0x1XD1Oskk2kaYggNCDmkGBq42b+t5rZL/WWJwX1Tp0 KLRgZSSD49M0oWvNSgwSQVucoWK30NH2KEODkgcWrD0E45pJuCT/TFn+k4vCkknNJyus FZzI9i7G+71DiLf1R3+6E4x9gQTb525KepnKdG160SjtHMH4GrWui4BSYZYrySo0UQwa v3Z71wRLj0wY79FIeZlIWvER04PBCKZbIELQpiR2FiJ893zCOBpCktM83r2dlV8UBpN2 8DWwvP+e99FmG1NNVrZk+QPphGOzkDH2Lwofi6OmP9rH6MHl07WLolXHkJi6e1w0kJDJ 4Bcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Wdy1BpCX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b17-20020a1709064d5100b0094ef9ad5770si7780628ejv.807.2023.06.13.14.51.45; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 14:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Wdy1BpCX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231675AbjFMVAD (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:00:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229447AbjFMVAB (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:00:01 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139511713; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686689996; x=1718225996; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gYeaVv6vTtT9+mAngWv61HXKJenzB3KUmTQ27EYagqE=; b=Wdy1BpCXVbojPhrc6kHpqj+wT3yxIGajsN7fGU8rcyp3cHApjexrOGhl w2D0swFjyJl2thOK0L3Hy6lbMxOX84jBObO+rQkvJ2x787YgHO24y1HLe Bml1MeCAi9TGDK9cayCPaCyO8J0uOuobUYHBOIfqK8drl1HtPYA5pv3kT m79HlUbl96ozKdpAoJ5gd5yCLmt/+3/U5cfL+4rn3+DZ8y6spDqfa1RoN IOJBfIU4JD7a0gOfV0xFlY0hDfBL1+BnDTXXbaiJRoFinoS/4+QxUxDAh 3AQ7/77lIRlE45tudeV1Ruu1hUGj1Btz/SmJRlmUCJKWHyd7oXV7ngK5j A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10740"; a="422048702" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,240,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="422048702" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jun 2023 13:59:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10740"; a="662135069" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,240,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="662135069" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2023 13:59:50 -0700 Received: from [10.251.24.95] (kliang2-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.251.24.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF52D580D43; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46da55c7-ecb6-05af-e1b6-2100cd65b259@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:59:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf metric: JSON flag to default metric group Content-Language: en-US To: Ian Rogers , ahmad.yasin@intel.com Cc: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com References: <20230607162700.3234712-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20230607162700.3234712-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> From: "Liang, Kan" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023-06-13 4:28 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 1:10 PM Liang, Kan wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2023-06-13 3:44 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:27 AM wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Kan Liang >>>> >>>> For the default output, the default metric group could vary on different >>>> platforms. For example, on SPR, the TopdownL1 and TopdownL2 metrics >>>> should be displayed in the default mode. On ICL, only the TopdownL1 >>>> should be displayed. >>>> >>>> Add a flag so we can tag the default metric group for different >>>> platforms rather than hack the perf code. >>>> >>>> The flag is added to Intel TopdownL1 since ICL and TopdownL2 metrics >>>> since SPR. >>>> >>>> Add a new field, DefaultMetricgroupName, in the JSON file to indicate >>>> the real metric group name. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang >>>> --- >>>> .../arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json | 20 ++++--- >>>> .../arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json | 20 ++++--- >>>> .../arch/x86/icelakex/icx-metrics.json | 20 ++++--- >>>> .../arch/x86/sapphirerapids/spr-metrics.json | 60 +++++++++++-------- >>>> .../arch/x86/tigerlake/tgl-metrics.json | 20 ++++--- >>>> 5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json >>>> index c9f7e3d4ab08..e78c85220e27 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/alderlake/adl-metrics.json >>>> @@ -832,22 +832,24 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "cpu_core@topdown\\-be\\-bound@ / (cpu_core@topdown\\-fe\\-bound@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-bad\\-spec@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-retiring@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-be\\-bound@) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_backend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend. Backend is the portion of the processor core where the out-of-order scheduler dispatches ready uops into their respective execution units; and once completed these uops get retired according to program order. For example; stalls due to data-cache misses or stalls due to the divider unit being overloaded are both categorized under Backend Bound. Backend Bound is further divided into two main categories: Memory Bound and Core Bound. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BACKEND_BOUND_SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%", >>>> "Unit": "cpu_core" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(1 - (tma_frontend_bound + tma_backend_bound + tma_retiring), 0)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_bad_speculation", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations. This include slots used to issue uops that do not eventually get retired and slots for which the issue-pipeline was blocked due to recovery from earlier incorrect speculation. For example; wasted work due to miss-predicted branches are categorized under Bad Speculation category. Incorrect data speculation followed by Memory Ordering Nukes is another example.", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%", >>>> "Unit": "cpu_core" >>>> @@ -1112,11 +1114,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "cpu_core@topdown\\-fe\\-bound@ / (cpu_core@topdown\\-fe\\-bound@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-bad\\-spec@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-retiring@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-be\\-bound@) - cpu_core@INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING@ / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_frontend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend. Frontend denotes the first part of the processor core responsible to fetch operations that are executed later on by the Backend part. Within the Frontend; a branch predictor predicts the next address to fetch; cache-lines are fetched from the memory subsystem; parsed into instructions; and lastly decoded into micro-operations (uops). Ideally the Frontend can issue Pipeline_Width uops every cycle to the Backend. Frontend Bound denotes unutilized issue-slots when there is no Backend stall; i.e. bubbles where Frontend delivered no uops while Backend could have accepted them. For example; stalls due to instruction-cache misses would be categorized under Frontend Bound. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_4_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%", >>>> "Unit": "cpu_core" >>>> @@ -2316,11 +2319,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "cpu_core@topdown\\-retiring@ / (cpu_core@topdown\\-fe\\-bound@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-bad\\-spec@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-retiring@ + cpu_core@topdown\\-be\\-bound@) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_retiring", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_retiring > 0.7 | tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired. Ideally; all pipeline slots would be attributed to the Retiring category. Retiring of 100% would indicate the maximum Pipeline_Width throughput was achieved. Maximizing Retiring typically increases the Instructions-per-cycle (see IPC metric). Note that a high Retiring value does not necessary mean there is no room for more performance. For example; Heavy-operations or Microcode Assists are categorized under Retiring. They often indicate suboptimal performance and can often be optimized or avoided. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%", >>>> "Unit": "cpu_core" >>> >>> For Alderlake the Default metric group is added for all cpu_core >>> metrics but not cpu_atom. This will lead to only getting metrics for >>> performance cores while the workload could be running on atoms. This >>> could lead to a false conclusion that the workload has no issues with >>> the metrics. I think this behavior is surprising and should be called >>> out as intentional in the commit message. >>> >> >> The e-core doesn't have enough counters to calculate all the Topdown >> events. It will trigger the multiplexing. We try to avoid it in the >> default mode. >> I will update the commit in V2. > > Is multiplexing a worse crime than only giving output for half the > cores? Both can be misleading. Perhaps the safest thing is to not use > Default on hybrid platforms. > I think if we cannot give the accurate number, we shouldn't show it. I don't think it's a problem just showing the Topdown on p-core. If the user doesn't find their interested data in the default mode, they can always use the --topdown for a specific core. Thanks, Kan > Thanks, > Ian > >> Thanks, >> Kan >> >>> Thanks, >>> Ian >>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json >>>> index 20210742171d..cc4edf855064 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelake/icl-metrics.json >>>> @@ -111,21 +111,23 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-be\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 5 * cpu@INT_MISC.RECOVERY_CYCLES\\,cmask\\=1\\,edge@ / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_backend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend. Backend is the portion of the processor core where the out-of-order scheduler dispatches ready uops into their respective execution units; and once completed these uops get retired according to program order. For example; stalls due to data-cache misses or stalls due to the divider unit being overloaded are both categorized under Backend Bound. Backend Bound is further divided into two main categories: Memory Bound and Core Bound. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BACKEND_BOUND_SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(1 - (tma_frontend_bound + tma_backend_bound + tma_retiring), 0)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_bad_speculation", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations. This include slots used to issue uops that do not eventually get retired and slots for which the issue-pipeline was blocked due to recovery from earlier incorrect speculation. For example; wasted work due to miss-predicted branches are categorized under Bad Speculation category. Incorrect data speculation followed by Memory Ordering Nukes is another example.", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -372,11 +374,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-fe\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) - INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_frontend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend. Frontend denotes the first part of the processor core responsible to fetch operations that are executed later on by the Backend part. Within the Frontend; a branch predictor predicts the next address to fetch; cache-lines are fetched from the memory subsystem; parsed into instructions; and lastly decoded into micro-operations (uops). Ideally the Frontend can issue Pipeline_Width uops every cycle to the Backend. Frontend Bound denotes unutilized issue-slots when there is no Backend stall; i.e. bubbles where Frontend delivered no uops while Backend could have accepted them. For example; stalls due to instruction-cache misses would be categorized under Frontend Bound. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_4_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1378,11 +1381,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-retiring / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_retiring", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_retiring > 0.7 | tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired. Ideally; all pipeline slots would be attributed to the Retiring category. Retiring of 100% would indicate the maximum Pipeline_Width throughput was achieved. Maximizing Retiring typically increases the Instructions-per-cycle (see IPC metric). Note that a high Retiring value does not necessary mean there is no room for more performance. For example; Heavy-operations or Microcode Assists are categorized under Retiring. They often indicate suboptimal performance and can often be optimized or avoided. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelakex/icx-metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelakex/icx-metrics.json >>>> index ef25cda019be..6f25b5b7aaf6 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelakex/icx-metrics.json >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/icelakex/icx-metrics.json >>>> @@ -315,21 +315,23 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-be\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 5 * cpu@INT_MISC.RECOVERY_CYCLES\\,cmask\\=1\\,edge@ / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_backend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend. Backend is the portion of the processor core where the out-of-order scheduler dispatches ready uops into their respective execution units; and once completed these uops get retired according to program order. For example; stalls due to data-cache misses or stalls due to the divider unit being overloaded are both categorized under Backend Bound. Backend Bound is further divided into two main categories: Memory Bound and Core Bound. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BACKEND_BOUND_SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(1 - (tma_frontend_bound + tma_backend_bound + tma_retiring), 0)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_bad_speculation", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations. This include slots used to issue uops that do not eventually get retired and slots for which the issue-pipeline was blocked due to recovery from earlier incorrect speculation. For example; wasted work due to miss-predicted branches are categorized under Bad Speculation category. Incorrect data speculation followed by Memory Ordering Nukes is another example.", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -576,11 +578,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-fe\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) - INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_frontend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend. Frontend denotes the first part of the processor core responsible to fetch operations that are executed later on by the Backend part. Within the Frontend; a branch predictor predicts the next address to fetch; cache-lines are fetched from the memory subsystem; parsed into instructions; and lastly decoded into micro-operations (uops). Ideally the Frontend can issue Pipeline_Width uops every cycle to the Backend. Frontend Bound denotes unutilized issue-slots when there is no Backend stall; i.e. bubbles where Frontend delivered no uops while Backend could have accepted them. For example; stalls due to instruction-cache misses would be categorized under Frontend Bound. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_4_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1674,11 +1677,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-retiring / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_retiring", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_retiring > 0.7 | tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired. Ideally; all pipeline slots would be attributed to the Retiring category. Retiring of 100% would indicate the maximum Pipeline_Width throughput was achieved. Maximizing Retiring typically increases the Instructions-per-cycle (see IPC metric). Note that a high Retiring value does not necessary mean there is no room for more performance. For example; Heavy-operations or Microcode Assists are categorized under Retiring. They often indicate suboptimal performance and can often be optimized or avoided. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/sapphirerapids/spr-metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/sapphirerapids/spr-metrics.json >>>> index 4f3dd85540b6..c732982f70b5 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/sapphirerapids/spr-metrics.json >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/sapphirerapids/spr-metrics.json >>>> @@ -340,31 +340,34 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-be\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_backend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend. Backend is the portion of the processor core where the out-of-order scheduler dispatches ready uops into their respective execution units; and once completed these uops get retired according to program order. For example; stalls due to data-cache misses or stalls due to the divider unit being overloaded are both categorized under Backend Bound. Backend Bound is further divided into two main categories: Memory Bound and Core Bound. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BACKEND_BOUND_SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(1 - (tma_frontend_bound + tma_backend_bound + tma_retiring), 0)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_bad_speculation", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations. This include slots used to issue uops that do not eventually get retired and slots for which the issue-pipeline was blocked due to recovery from earlier incorrect speculation. For example; wasted work due to miss-predicted branches are categorized under Bad Speculation category. Incorrect data speculation followed by Memory Ordering Nukes is another example.", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU has wasted due to Branch Misprediction", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-br\\-mispredict / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "BadSpec;BrMispredicts;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_bad_speculation_group;tma_issueBM", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "BadSpec;BrMispredicts;Default;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_bad_speculation_group;tma_issueBM", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_branch_mispredicts", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_branch_mispredicts > 0.1 & tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU has wasted due to Branch Misprediction. These slots are either wasted by uops fetched from an incorrectly speculated program path; or stalls when the out-of-order part of the machine needs to recover its state from a speculative path. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BR_MISPREDICT_SLOTS. Related metrics: tma_info_bad_spec_branch_misprediction_cost, tma_info_bottleneck_mispredictions, tma_mispredicts_resteers", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -407,11 +410,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where Core non-memory issues were of a bottleneck", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(0, tma_backend_bound - tma_memory_bound)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "Backend;Compute;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_backend_bound_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Backend;Compute;Default;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_backend_bound_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_core_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_core_bound > 0.1 & tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where Core non-memory issues were of a bottleneck. Shortage in hardware compute resources; or dependencies in software's instructions are both categorized under Core Bound. Hence it may indicate the machine ran out of an out-of-order resource; certain execution units are overloaded or dependencies in program's data- or instruction-flow are limiting the performance (e.g. FP-chained long-latency arithmetic operations).", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -509,21 +513,23 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU was stalled due to Frontend bandwidth issues", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(0, tma_frontend_bound - tma_fetch_latency)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "FetchBW;Frontend;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_frontend_bound_group;tma_issueFB", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;FetchBW;Frontend;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_frontend_bound_group;tma_issueFB", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_fetch_bandwidth", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_fetch_bandwidth > 0.1 & tma_frontend_bound > 0.15 & tma_info_thread_ipc / 6 > 0.35", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU was stalled due to Frontend bandwidth issues. For example; inefficiencies at the instruction decoders; or restrictions for caching in the DSB (decoded uops cache) are categorized under Fetch Bandwidth. In such cases; the Frontend typically delivers suboptimal amount of uops to the Backend. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_2_BUBBLES_GE_1_PS;FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_1_PS;FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_2_PS. Related metrics: tma_dsb_switches, tma_info_botlnk_l2_dsb_misses, tma_info_frontend_dsb_coverage, tma_info_inst_mix_iptb, tma_lcp", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU was stalled due to Frontend latency issues", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-fetch\\-lat / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) - INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "Frontend;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_frontend_bound_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;Frontend;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_frontend_bound_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_fetch_latency", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_fetch_latency > 0.1 & tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU was stalled due to Frontend latency issues. For example; instruction-cache misses; iTLB misses or fetch stalls after a branch misprediction are categorized under Frontend Latency. In such cases; the Frontend eventually delivers no uops for some period. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_16_PS;FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_8_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -611,11 +617,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-fe\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) - INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_frontend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend. Frontend denotes the first part of the processor core responsible to fetch operations that are executed later on by the Backend part. Within the Frontend; a branch predictor predicts the next address to fetch; cache-lines are fetched from the memory subsystem; parsed into instructions; and lastly decoded into micro-operations (uops). Ideally the Frontend can issue Pipeline_Width uops every cycle to the Backend. Frontend Bound denotes unutilized issue-slots when there is no Backend stall; i.e. bubbles where Frontend delivered no uops while Backend could have accepted them. For example; stalls due to instruction-cache misses would be categorized under Frontend Bound. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_4_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -630,11 +637,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where the CPU was retiring heavy-weight operations -- instructions that require two or more uops or micro-coded sequences", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-heavy\\-ops / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "Retire;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_retiring_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;Retire;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_retiring_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_heavy_operations", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where the CPU was retiring heavy-weight operations -- instructions that require two or more uops or micro-coded sequences. This highly-correlates with the uop length of these instructions/sequences. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.HEAVY", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1486,11 +1494,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where the CPU was retiring light-weight operations -- instructions that require no more than one uop (micro-operation)", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(0, tma_retiring - tma_heavy_operations)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "Retire;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_retiring_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;Retire;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_retiring_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_light_operations", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_light_operations > 0.6", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots where the CPU was retiring light-weight operations -- instructions that require no more than one uop (micro-operation). This correlates with total number of instructions used by the program. A uops-per-instruction (see UopPI metric) ratio of 1 or less should be expected for decently optimized software running on Intel Core/Xeon products. While this often indicates efficient X86 instructions were executed; high value does not necessarily mean better performance cannot be achieved. Sample with: INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1540,11 +1549,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU has wasted due to Machine Clears", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(0, tma_bad_speculation - tma_branch_mispredicts)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "BadSpec;MachineClears;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_bad_speculation_group;tma_issueMC;tma_issueSyncxn", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "BadSpec;Default;MachineClears;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_bad_speculation_group;tma_issueMC;tma_issueSyncxn", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_machine_clears", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_machine_clears > 0.1 & tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the CPU has wasted due to Machine Clears. These slots are either wasted by uops fetched prior to the clear; or stalls the out-of-order portion of the machine needs to recover its state after the clear. For example; this can happen due to memory ordering Nukes (e.g. Memory Disambiguation) or Self-Modifying-Code (SMC) nukes. Sample with: MACHINE_CLEARS.COUNT. Related metrics: tma_clears_resteers, tma_contested_accesses, tma_data_sharing, tma_false_sharing, tma_l1_bound, tma_microcode_sequencer, tma_ms_switches, tma_remote_cache", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1576,11 +1586,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the Memory subsystem within the Backend was a bottleneck", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL2", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-mem\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "Backend;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_backend_bound_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Backend;Default;TmaL2;TopdownL2;tma_L2_group;tma_backend_bound_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_memory_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_memory_bound > 0.2 & tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL2;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This metric represents fraction of slots the Memory subsystem within the Backend was a bottleneck. Memory Bound estimates fraction of slots where pipeline is likely stalled due to demand load or store instructions. This accounts mainly for (1) non-completed in-flight memory demand loads which coincides with execution units starvation; in addition to (2) cases where stores could impose backpressure on the pipeline when many of them get buffered at the same time (less common out of the two).", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1784,11 +1795,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-retiring / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_retiring", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_retiring > 0.7 | tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired. Ideally; all pipeline slots would be attributed to the Retiring category. Retiring of 100% would indicate the maximum Pipeline_Width throughput was achieved. Maximizing Retiring typically increases the Instructions-per-cycle (see IPC metric). Note that a high Retiring value does not necessary mean there is no room for more performance. For example; Heavy-operations or Microcode Assists are categorized under Retiring. They often indicate suboptimal performance and can often be optimized or avoided. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/tigerlake/tgl-metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/tigerlake/tgl-metrics.json >>>> index d0538a754288..83346911aa63 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/tigerlake/tgl-metrics.json >>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/x86/tigerlake/tgl-metrics.json >>>> @@ -105,21 +105,23 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-be\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 5 * cpu@INT_MISC.RECOVERY_CYCLES\\,cmask\\=1\\,edge@ / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_backend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_backend_bound > 0.2", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where no uops are being delivered due to a lack of required resources for accepting new uops in the Backend. Backend is the portion of the processor core where the out-of-order scheduler dispatches ready uops into their respective execution units; and once completed these uops get retired according to program order. For example; stalls due to data-cache misses or stalls due to the divider unit being overloaded are both categorized under Backend Bound. Backend Bound is further divided into two main categories: Memory Bound and Core Bound. Sample with: TOPDOWN.BACKEND_BOUND_SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "max(1 - (tma_frontend_bound + tma_backend_bound + tma_retiring), 0)", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_bad_speculation", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_bad_speculation > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots wasted due to incorrect speculations. This include slots used to issue uops that do not eventually get retired and slots for which the issue-pipeline was blocked due to recovery from earlier incorrect speculation. For example; wasted work due to miss-predicted branches are categorized under Bad Speculation category. Incorrect data speculation followed by Memory Ordering Nukes is another example.", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -366,11 +368,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-fe\\-bound / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) - INT_MISC.UOP_DROPPING / tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;PGO;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_frontend_bound", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_frontend_bound > 0.15", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots where the processor's Frontend undersupplies its Backend. Frontend denotes the first part of the processor core responsible to fetch operations that are executed later on by the Backend part. Within the Frontend; a branch predictor predicts the next address to fetch; cache-lines are fetched from the memory subsystem; parsed into instructions; and lastly decoded into micro-operations (uops). Ideally the Frontend can issue Pipeline_Width uops every cycle to the Backend. Frontend Bound denotes unutilized issue-slots when there is no Backend stall; i.e. bubbles where Frontend delivered no uops while Backend could have accepted them. For example; stalls due to instruction-cache misses would be categorized under Frontend Bound. Sample with: FRONTEND_RETIRED.LATENCY_GE_4_PS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> @@ -1392,11 +1395,12 @@ >>>> }, >>>> { >>>> "BriefDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired", >>>> + "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1", >>>> "MetricExpr": "topdown\\-retiring / (topdown\\-fe\\-bound + topdown\\-bad\\-spec + topdown\\-retiring + topdown\\-be\\-bound) + 0 * tma_info_thread_slots", >>>> - "MetricGroup": "TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> + "MetricGroup": "Default;TmaL1;TopdownL1;tma_L1_group", >>>> "MetricName": "tma_retiring", >>>> "MetricThreshold": "tma_retiring > 0.7 | tma_heavy_operations > 0.1", >>>> - "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1", >>>> + "MetricgroupNoGroup": "TopdownL1;Default", >>>> "PublicDescription": "This category represents fraction of slots utilized by useful work i.e. issued uops that eventually get retired. Ideally; all pipeline slots would be attributed to the Retiring category. Retiring of 100% would indicate the maximum Pipeline_Width throughput was achieved. Maximizing Retiring typically increases the Instructions-per-cycle (see IPC metric). Note that a high Retiring value does not necessary mean there is no room for more performance. For example; Heavy-operations or Microcode Assists are categorized under Retiring. They often indicate suboptimal performance and can often be optimized or avoided. Sample with: UOPS_RETIRED.SLOTS", >>>> "ScaleUnit": "100%" >>>> }, >>>> -- >>>> 2.35.1 >>>>