Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp2449995rwd; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:04:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6Nk+/aIjpnSIXLS7iZnNybCa5wyhIzDlfYhOpcx7RY4oQ+42LjHbrGAMFnEs9qy5rLeUYR X-Received: by 2002:a92:ce06:0:b0:340:b37d:138f with SMTP id b6-20020a92ce06000000b00340b37d138fmr359516ilo.2.1686737049527; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:04:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686737049; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AJY9G3BfOt9VD9R0URwciATDK1WW3yM/TvCbnaxKBE4dpb38B4H7XYfs8ZObuJPnDl pM1HuOaAdqusOWI7Cd5AoXFPclnGYU75LDEwXoK/rtavZdCJa4EEUS66FhYnFPDVsaB1 LMlPJTHBW1cgCGNiyNxAdJ7yKjGoCAdoH7KkqJdtXoZUzNc20Yf/nB1bz7k/uumAMqno bVmhHI2eh2wLPI80RYF0oxFu5k5AIMguYdGG2k+tbQsIqXm2anqUvLpADCpNTPQ4R0Dw B5uBW42xb0tc7grq1J8VfgaEq/2GTVS9rmMg7pRrRCF6FWg+ZaS8NUKmenyC0IepP5nb /BHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=k8/kluo4EhxJUN1w8Wkxa+89VuHL9oMdcgH3J0LyeG0=; b=vH0JHj1sH6lcEl0ftlGIJHSKZKL4TKDls7UI0NRSwLV8M1KIj3oIGtlHEITVxl/2TF Z4N2gdT9U436x1pHCofLFBXl27+YcPtYFT+Tlo4gdv6ak71VAhQYMY3PX9lKFICQH7AG tydJAvMO8+LTQApA1f38GA1wYE/EU7A8nzUNGUzCCw04iW/gdB2cWyIxJ/Z76vFnmb9I 7UgopgUIXQF8PIvK2eiyxdd+EYjstAyfYqWM4f96u129t9lsVantSkYdmc6byeFduBUU udM4ZrJ58mK421JErG37eWWLCsqH0h1gbDHH9Bi0XgW3CrcqpGFV36QRgd2On0gCvJip 94nw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="Az/2Llqz"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q30-20020a63751e000000b0053b99f632c9si10022036pgc.842.2023.06.14.03.03.57; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="Az/2Llqz"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240491AbjFNJwU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 05:52:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234134AbjFNJwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 05:52:18 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DC5DC; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 02:52:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1686736334; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k8/kluo4EhxJUN1w8Wkxa+89VuHL9oMdcgH3J0LyeG0=; b=Az/2Llqz+IM3XCNfPKYHopkPqaXC+pwMBOIpVA+mJJHPWxSPOIY34kEAIaen1V0Ow+QlxI NwXssu9xAGcIJuH9pLqUTwxjEj03zgvfEssBnfsHPEPQIBpsWpsym5MYe87R56oVEK6Ppg so8zxD9U3nruzhrdwW2y8dBP09ZrsaczRfdum4KYj2TOgHQWqvaDr8+oKdPXE/SpaX1Vb0 dUO9xBd0DLIueg+D6EjwtITyCleCX9eGbA0lXl1NQ8rRG3RuKc1Q695iKe085RguBbM6B1 KehZaYHQ9WpTKOCQntKCcBydTrGOqa6dvjJFZUj8dWdUzmbM7Ell8lih0F5yrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1686736334; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=k8/kluo4EhxJUN1w8Wkxa+89VuHL9oMdcgH3J0LyeG0=; b=FVmcyAPxnopLQkGRCsMmFInFjSnDHkimejjG/YwNIqrUEGJ3/xx0bziZNTPs5wNfY73Etv rMYxWz+Vccq4JaAQ== To: "Chang S. Bae" , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Nikolay Borisov , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Richard Henderson , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Michael Ellerman , Chris Zankel , Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [patch 17/17] x86/fpu: Move FPU initialization into arch_cpu_finalize_init() In-Reply-To: <23dc1c47-88ee-6b2d-1a5a-d6c812bb1761@intel.com> References: <20230613223827.532680283@linutronix.de> <20230613224545.902376621@linutronix.de> <23dc1c47-88ee-6b2d-1a5a-d6c812bb1761@intel.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:52:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7li8j75.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 13 2023 at 22:03, Chang S. Bae wrote: > On 6/13/2023 4:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> @@ -2396,6 +2393,13 @@ void __init arch_cpu_finalize_init(void) >> '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86); >> } >> >> + /* >> + * Must be before alternatives because it might set or clear >> + * feature bits. >> + */ >> + fpu__init_system(); >> + fpu__init_cpu(); > > fpu__init_cpu() appears to be duplicated here because fpu__init_system() > invoked this already: > > void __init fpu__init_system(void) > { > ... > /* > * The FPU has to be operational for some of the > * later FPU init activities: > */ > fpu__init_cpu(); Well, that's _before_ xstate initialization and I couldn't convince myself that it's good enough. All of this is such a horrible mess...