Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758234AbXJQFfx (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:35:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750844AbXJQFfn (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:35:43 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:35904 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbXJQFfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:35:42 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Rob Landley Cc: Theodore Tso , James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Suparna Bhattacharya , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: What still uses the block layer? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:04:00 CDT." <200710150304.00901.rob@landley.net> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200710112011.22000.rob@landley.net> <200710141845.44750.rob@landley.net> <20071015014503.GF9715@thunk.org> <200710150304.00901.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1192599264_3070P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:34:24 -0400 Message-ID: <25897.1192599264@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1836 Lines: 42 --==_Exmh_1192599264_3070P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:04:00 CDT, Rob Landley said: > I note that the eth0 and eth1 names are dynamically assigned on a first come > first serve basis (like scsi). This never causes me a problem because the > driver loading order is constant, and once you figure out that eth0 is > gigabit and eth1 is the 80211g it _stays_ that way across reboots, reliably. > Yeah, it's a heuristic. Hands up everybody relying on such a heuristic in > the real world. I've gotten burned by that heuristic enough times to not rely on it. My last laptop had an ethernet on the motherboard, a *separate* ethernet in the docking station, an ethernet on a multifunction pcmcia card (I usually just used the modem side), and a wireless that looked like an ethernet - so it was possible for a given interface to be eth1 (if no dock and no pcmcia card) or eth3 (if both were present). And that's on a laptop from almost 5 years ago. And then there's the recent Sun and Dell 1U rack-mounts that have 4 ethernets on the motherboard, and they *never* seem to assign in a 0,1,2,3 order that matches the 0 1 2 3 printed above the 4 RJ45's ;) So I have for years been a proponent of 'ethN is nailed by MAC address' :) --==_Exmh_1192599264_3070P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHFZ7gcC3lWbTT17ARAsZXAJ4xuUB1ebX7Vk0jcCwwfaDOEL+g4gCg7TJf rz3Is447x34Dx3ZHEU167KY= =glX8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1192599264_3070P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/