Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230614231446.3687-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230614231446.3687-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 12:10:26 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfVF3giovZ=qA423rZNEP_m2bpD_dmBvdGp2UrueKOs4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: aggregator: Incorporate gpio-delay functionality
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 2:14=E2=80=AFAM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> The newly appeared gpio-delay module enables external signal delay lines
> that may be connected to the GPIOs. But at the same time it copies the
> GPIO forwarder functionality. Besides that the approach does not scale.
> If we would have another external component, we would need yet another
> driver. That's why I think, and seems others support me, better to
> enable such a functionality inside GPIO aggregator driver.
>
> Patch 1 is a cleanup that may be applied independently on the decision
> about the rest.
>
> Please, test and comment!

Alexander, I have slightly changed the code, can you test this and
give your formal Tested-by tag?

--=20
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko