Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <964937b8-a7a1-71ad-5e12-8d4a854504a1@tessares.net>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:30:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Content-Language: en-GB
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
References: <20230614111752.74207e28@canb.auug.org.au>
 <c473ffea-49c3-1c9c-b35c-cd3978369d0f@tessares.net>
 <20230614104133.55c93a32@kernel.org>
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
In-Reply-To: <20230614104133.55c93a32@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jakub,

On 14/06/2023 19:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:51:16 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> I added a note about the conflicts on the cover-letter:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230609-upstream-net-20230610-mptcp-selftests-support-old-kernels-part-3-v1-0-2896fe2ee8a3@tessares.net/
>>
>> Maybe it was not a good place? I didn't know where to put it as there
>> were multiple patches that were conflicting with each others even if the
>> major conflicts were between 47867f0a7e83 ("selftests: mptcp: join: skip
>> check if MIB counter not supported") and 0639fa230a21 ("selftests:
>> mptcp: add explicit check for new mibs"). I guess next time I should add
>> a comment referring to the cover-letter in the patches creating conflicts.
> 
> Hm, yeah, I think the cover letter may not be the best way.
> Looks like Stephen didn't use it, anyway, and it confused patchwork.
> No better idea where to put it tho :(
> 
> Maybe a link to a git rerere resolution uploaded somewhere we can wget
> from easily?

Good idea, I didn't think about git rerere! I will try to remember about
that next time :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net