Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936461AbXJQQjk (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:39:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S935921AbXJQQjU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:39:20 -0400 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:4401 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935408AbXJQQjS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:39:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:39:16 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Erez Zadok Cc: "Mike D. Day" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Fix line number reporting Message-ID: <20071017163916.GO21136@shadowen.org> References: <20071015182118.GA4459@shadowen.org> <200710161759.l9GHxnkK012590@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710161759.l9GHxnkK012590@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SPF-Guess: neutral Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3075 Lines: 63 On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:59:49PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > In message <20071015182118.GA4459@shadowen.org>, Andy Whitcroft writes: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:35:12PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > > > In message <20071012193751.GA31579@shadowen.org>, Andy Whitcroft writes: > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 03:26:54PM -0400, Mike D. Day wrote: > > > > > Fix line number reporting when checking source files (as opposed to > > > > > patches) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike D. Day > > > > > > > > Sorry you've had to fix this about 4 times, mostly because of ongoing > > > > changes, and slow replication getting in the way. I've applied this > > > > and you should find it in -next when replication hits. md5sum is > > > > below of the version with it in, so you can make sure you've got > > > > the right one. > > > > > > > > 54f053c50265e44a6041e3147dc66a69 checkpatch.pl > > > > > > > > -apw > > > > > > Andy, I've tested the --emacs feature in the above latest > > > checkpatch.pl-next. Below is a patch that completes the functionality of > > > the --emacs option: it ensures that only the cc-style error messages are > > > printed, no extra context lines or caret lines, no extra newlines, etc. > > > Although this patch changes every call to a message-producing function, it > > > is a trivial change, and I believe it's the cleanest way to handle the > > > separation between the terse cc-style messages and the verbose default > > > messages. With this patch, I can finally test a single source file as > > > follows: > > > > > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -q -q --emacs --file path/name/to/file > > > > Ok I don't understand why the rest of the lines are a problem? At least > > with emacs the extra context lines are just ignored right? Are you > > trying to use this as a summary? > > Andy, > > I'm trying to minimize excess stuff that's not necessarily useful for > everyone, and to match what is done elsewhere. For example, I don't need > those extra newlines and find them a distraction. And if get an error > message such as "put a space after a comma", I don't really need a caret > sign to point to the exact char in the line where it is. > > When g/cc prints out errors from a compile, the errors are one per line, w/o > any additional context lines, caret markers, newlines, etc. grep -n does > the same (also useful inside emacs). So I'm just asking for a way to have > the same terse format. > > If you feel that the extra info is still useful for some people, then can > you please provide a way for some people like me to turn off the extra lines > (pass a third -q, or a --terse option)? Ahh, ok so this isn't quite the same as the --emacs madness. Will see what we can do. I saw your patch changing every caller, and perhaps we can avoid that. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/